diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/de/amazon-rms-tim.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/de/amazon-rms-tim.html | 104 |
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/de/amazon-rms-tim.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/de/amazon-rms-tim.html index 506449b..9663456 100644 --- a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/de/amazon-rms-tim.html +++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/de/amazon-rms-tim.html @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/amazon-rms-tim.en.html" --> <!--#include virtual="/server/header.de.html" --> -<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --> +<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 --> +<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html --> +<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays laws patents" --> +<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" --> <!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! --> <title>Amazon Boykott: Nachricht von Richard Stallman an Tim O’Reilly - GNU-Projekt @@ -9,14 +12,20 @@ <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/amazon-rms-tim.translist" --> <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.de.html" --> +<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.de.html" --> +<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE--> +<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.de.html" --> +<div class="article reduced-width"> <h2>Amazon Boykott: Nachricht von Richard Stallman an Tim O’Reilly</h2> -<p> -Diese Nachricht hat <a href="http://www.stallman.org/">Richard +<div class="infobox"> +<p><i>Diese Nachricht hat <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard M. Stallman</a> an Tim O'Reilly am 11. März 2000 bezüglich der Erklärung von Jeff Bezos, Vorstandsvorsitzender von Amazon, gesendet, welcher aufrief, -Softwarepatente auf 3 oder 5 Jahre zu begrenzen.</p> +Softwarepatente auf 3 oder 5 Jahre zu begrenzen.</i></p> +</div> +<div class="important"> <p> Weitere Hintergrundinformationen sind unter <a href="/philosophy/amazon">Boykottiert Amazon!</a> abrufbar. @@ -27,47 +36,49 @@ Bitte unterstützen Sie uns bei diesem Boykott durch einen Verweis auf <strong><a href="/philosophy/amazon.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/amazon.html</a></strong> von Ihrer eigenen Webseite!<a href="#tn1" id="tn1-ref" -class="transnote">[*]</a> +class="transnote">[*]</a><br /> + </p> +</div> +<hr class="thin" /> -<pre> -<span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The idea that software patents should last 3 or 5 years has been -proposed for a decade now, as a compromise that would eliminate most -of the harm that software patents now do. Support for this idea from -Jeff Bezos is a good thing, since it may bring us a step closer to -action by Congress. Congratulations for helping to bring this about. - -But such a law is far from imminent, and in the mean time, Amazon is -still responsible for its actions. - -We singled out Amazon for a boycott, among the thousands of companies -that have obtained software patents, because Amazon is among the few -that have gone so far as to actually sue someone. That makes them an -egregious offender. Most software patent holders say they have -software patents "for defensive purposes", to press for -cross-licensing in case they are threatened with patent lawsuits. -Since this is a real strategy for self-defense, many of these patent -holders could mean what they say. But this excuse is not available -for Amazon, because they fired the first shot. - +<p> +The idea that software patents should last 3 or 5 years has been proposed +for a decade now, as a compromise that would eliminate most of the harm that +software patents now do. Support for this idea from Jeff Bezos is a good +thing, since it may bring us a step closer to action by Congress. +Congratulations for helping to bring this about. +</p><p> +But such a law is far from imminent, and in the mean time, Amazon is still +responsible for its actions. +</p><p> +We singled out Amazon for a boycott, among the thousands of companies that +have obtained software patents, because Amazon is among the few that have +gone so far as to actually sue someone. That makes them an egregious +offender. Most software patent holders say they have software patents +“for defensive purposes.” to press for cross-licensing in case +they are threatened with patent lawsuits. Since this is a real strategy for +self-defense, many of these patent holders could mean what they say. But +this excuse is not available for Amazon, because they fired the first shot. +</p><p> Bezos's letter reaffirms Amazon's continuing intention to engage in -unrestricted patent warfare, saying that the decision of when and -where to attack will be decided by "business reasons". I would gladly -join Bezos in supporting a bill to limit software patents to 3 or 5 -years, but I believe we must continue to criticize and boycott Amazon -until such a bill is actually adopted--or until Amazon makes some -other suitable change in its own conduct to justify a change in ours. - -This does not mean insisting that Amazon must go so far as to -terminate its own patents. Deterrence with patents is an inadequate -defense against aggressors armed with patents, but it is the only -defense, so I would not ask Amazon (or anyone) to refrain from using -patents for self-defense or for collective security. Rather, Amazon -and other software patent holders should abjure the use of patents for -aggression, and adopt a no-first-use policy. If Amazon does this, in -an irrevocable and binding way, I would have no further criticism of -Amazon.</span> -</pre> +unrestricted patent warfare, saying that the decision of when and where to +attack will be decided by “business reasons.” I would gladly +join Bezos in supporting a bill to limit software patents to 3 or 5 years, +but I believe we must continue to criticize and boycott Amazon until such a +bill is actually adopted—or until Amazon makes some other suitable +change in its own conduct to justify a change in ours. +</p><p> +This does not mean insisting that Amazon must go so far as to terminate its +own patents. Deterrence with patents is an inadequate defense against +aggressors armed with patents, but it is the only defense, so I would not +ask Amazon (or anyone) to refrain from using patents for self-defense or for +collective security. Rather, Amazon and other software patent holders +should abjure the use of patents for aggression, and adopt a no-first-use +policy. If Amazon does this, in an irrevocable and binding way, I would +have no further criticism of Amazon. +</p> +</div> <div class="translators-notes"> @@ -79,7 +90,7 @@ im September 2002 den Boykott von Amazon zu beenden.</li></ol></div> <!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --> <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.de.html" --> -<div id="footer"> +<div id="footer" role="contentinfo"> <div class="unprintable"> <p>Bitte senden Sie allgemeine Fragen zur FSF & GNU an <a @@ -101,7 +112,7 @@ werden.</p> <web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p> - <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of + <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of our web pages, see <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a>. --> @@ -131,7 +142,7 @@ href="/server/standards/README.translations">LIESMICH für Übersetzungen</a>.</ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --> -<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2008, 2014, 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p> +<p>Copyright © 2000, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p> <p>Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer <a rel="license" href="//creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.de">Creative Commons @@ -148,11 +159,12 @@ href="https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/www-de"><www-de></a>, 2011, <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start --> Letzte Änderung: -$Date: 2020/07/05 14:01:36 $ +$Date: 2021/10/08 10:06:11 $ <!-- timestamp end --> </p> </div> </div> +<!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include --> </body> </html> |