update RMS articles

1 files changed, 41 insertions, 17 deletions

diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html
index 4bfe696..7dc76ad 100644
--- a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html
+++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html
@@ -1,12 +1,19 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
+<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
+<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays licensing non-cpleft" -->
+<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
 <title>The Motif License - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/motif.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
-   
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
+<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
+<div class="article reduced-width">
 <h2>The Motif License</h2>
 
-<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard Stallman</strong></a></p>
+<address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard
+Stallman</a></address>
 
 <p>
 A couple of weeks ago, the Open Group changed the license of Motif,
@@ -15,7 +22,7 @@ license does not fit either the definition of free software, or the
 looser definition of open source software.</p>
 <p>
 Their announcement says they have released Motif to &ldquo;the open
-source community&rdquo;, but this is true only in an unnatural
+source community,&rdquo; but this is true only in an unnatural
 interpretation of the words.  They have not made Motif available
 within the free software community; instead, they have invited the
 people in the free software community to leave the community by using
@@ -45,7 +52,7 @@ Here are some of the problems of the Motif license:</p>
   </li>
 
   <li>The license is restricted to use on certain operating systems,
-      those which fit a category they call &ldquo;open source&rdquo;.
+      those which fit a category they call &ldquo;open source.&rdquo;
       Both the free software movement and the open source camp 
       consider use restrictions unacceptable.
   </li>
@@ -64,15 +71,17 @@ stands for, we think people should not misrepresent what it stands
 for.  The facts of the situation are complex enough; confusing the
 issue is not welcome.</p>
 
-<h3 id="LaterNote">Later Note</h3>
+<h3 id="LaterNote" class="footnote">Later Note</h3>
 
 <p>
-<em>In 2012, <a href="http://motif.sourceforge.net/">
+<em>In 2012, <a href="https://motif.ics.com/">
 Motif</a> was released under the GNU Lesser General Public
 License, version 2.1.</em></p>
+</div>
+
 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
+<div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
 <div class="unprintable">
 
 <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to <a
@@ -90,31 +99,46 @@ href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
         to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
 
-        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
         our web pages, see <a
         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
         README</a>. -->
 Please see the <a
 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for
-information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article.</p>
+information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 1997, 1998, 1999, 2007, 2008, 2010 Free Software Foundation,
-Inc.</p>
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright &copy; 1997-1999, 2013, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 12:40:27 $
+$Date: 2021/10/01 17:02:54 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
-</div>
+</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
 </body>
 </html>