diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html')
-rw-r--r-- | talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html | 58 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html index 4bfe696..7dc76ad 100644 --- a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html +++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/motif.html @@ -1,12 +1,19 @@ <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --> -<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --> +<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 --> +<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html --> +<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays licensing non-cpleft" --> +<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" --> <title>The Motif License - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title> <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/motif.translist" --> <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --> - +<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" --> +<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE--> +<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" --> +<div class="article reduced-width"> <h2>The Motif License</h2> -<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard Stallman</strong></a></p> +<address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard +Stallman</a></address> <p> A couple of weeks ago, the Open Group changed the license of Motif, @@ -15,7 +22,7 @@ license does not fit either the definition of free software, or the looser definition of open source software.</p> <p> Their announcement says they have released Motif to “the open -source community”, but this is true only in an unnatural +source community,” but this is true only in an unnatural interpretation of the words. They have not made Motif available within the free software community; instead, they have invited the people in the free software community to leave the community by using @@ -45,7 +52,7 @@ Here are some of the problems of the Motif license:</p> </li> <li>The license is restricted to use on certain operating systems, - those which fit a category they call “open source”. + those which fit a category they call “open source.” Both the free software movement and the open source camp consider use restrictions unacceptable. </li> @@ -64,15 +71,17 @@ stands for, we think people should not misrepresent what it stands for. The facts of the situation are complex enough; confusing the issue is not welcome.</p> -<h3 id="LaterNote">Later Note</h3> +<h3 id="LaterNote" class="footnote">Later Note</h3> <p> -<em>In 2012, <a href="http://motif.sourceforge.net/"> +<em>In 2012, <a href="https://motif.ics.com/"> Motif</a> was released under the GNU Lesser General Public License, version 2.1.</em></p> +</div> + </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --> <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --> -<div id="footer"> +<div id="footer" role="contentinfo"> <div class="unprintable"> <p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to <a @@ -90,31 +99,46 @@ href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p> to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org"> <web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p> - <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of + <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of our web pages, see <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a>. --> Please see the <a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for -information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article.</p> +information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article.</p> </div> -<p>Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, 2007, 2008, 2010 Free Software Foundation, -Inc.</p> +<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to + files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should + be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this + without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first. + Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the + document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the + document was modified, or published. + + If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too. + Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying + years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable + year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including + being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system). + + There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers + Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --> + +<p>Copyright © 1997-1999, 2013, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p> <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license" -href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative -Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>. -</p> +href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative +Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p> <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --> <p class="unprintable">Updated: <!-- timestamp start --> -$Date: 2014/04/12 12:40:27 $ +$Date: 2021/10/01 17:02:54 $ <!-- timestamp end --> </p> </div> -</div> +</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include --> </body> </html> |