summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/comparison
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJeffrey Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>2017-08-21 17:58:50 +0200
committerJeffrey Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>2017-08-21 17:58:50 +0200
commitfa768b5f34e34e24c0d879df247b93015d478cf2 (patch)
tree188704b390b7c39828f12c7996af9c5edbd33f83 /comparison
parentf39d250242a649ff1f53a58a978f6b90a950619a (diff)
downloadpapers-fa768b5f34e34e24c0d879df247b93015d478cf2.tar.gz
papers-fa768b5f34e34e24c0d879df247b93015d478cf2.tar.bz2
papers-fa768b5f34e34e24c0d879df247b93015d478cf2.zip
Batching
Diffstat (limited to 'comparison')
-rw-r--r--comparison/comparison.tex5
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/comparison/comparison.tex b/comparison/comparison.tex
index df6c4b5..af8c9dc 100644
--- a/comparison/comparison.tex
+++ b/comparison/comparison.tex
@@ -169,10 +169,9 @@ Taler
Does the scheme save bandwidth through batching?
Compact e-cash schemes provide withdrawal operations that extract
many coins with one single withdrawal (W), reducing overall bandwidth
- for fixed denomination values, but not computation. %% VERIFY
+ for fixed denomination values.
Divisible e-cash schemes batch both withdrawal and deposit operations (WD),
- providing greater bandwidth reduction, and possibly computation
- reduction. There is a trade off between these savings and the exchange's
+ providing greater bandwidth reduction. There is a trade off between these savings and the exchange's
storage requirements, and the divisible schemes depend upon trusted setup
for their anonymity properties.
\item \textbf{Change/Divisibility.}