summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/comparison
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'comparison')
-rw-r--r--comparison/comparison.tex5
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/comparison/comparison.tex b/comparison/comparison.tex
index df6c4b5..af8c9dc 100644
--- a/comparison/comparison.tex
+++ b/comparison/comparison.tex
@@ -169,10 +169,9 @@ Taler
Does the scheme save bandwidth through batching?
Compact e-cash schemes provide withdrawal operations that extract
many coins with one single withdrawal (W), reducing overall bandwidth
- for fixed denomination values, but not computation. %% VERIFY
+ for fixed denomination values.
Divisible e-cash schemes batch both withdrawal and deposit operations (WD),
- providing greater bandwidth reduction, and possibly computation
- reduction. There is a trade off between these savings and the exchange's
+ providing greater bandwidth reduction. There is a trade off between these savings and the exchange's
storage requirements, and the divisible schemes depend upon trusted setup
for their anonymity properties.
\item \textbf{Change/Divisibility.}