From fa768b5f34e34e24c0d879df247b93015d478cf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeffrey Burdges Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:58:50 +0200 Subject: Batching --- comparison/comparison.tex | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'comparison') diff --git a/comparison/comparison.tex b/comparison/comparison.tex index df6c4b5..af8c9dc 100644 --- a/comparison/comparison.tex +++ b/comparison/comparison.tex @@ -169,10 +169,9 @@ Taler Does the scheme save bandwidth through batching? Compact e-cash schemes provide withdrawal operations that extract many coins with one single withdrawal (W), reducing overall bandwidth - for fixed denomination values, but not computation. %% VERIFY + for fixed denomination values. Divisible e-cash schemes batch both withdrawal and deposit operations (WD), - providing greater bandwidth reduction, and possibly computation - reduction. There is a trade off between these savings and the exchange's + providing greater bandwidth reduction. There is a trade off between these savings and the exchange's storage requirements, and the divisible schemes depend upon trusted setup for their anonymity properties. \item \textbf{Change/Divisibility.} -- cgit v1.2.3