Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
More precisely, make them untransferable if they were created through
*our* APIs, because those do not follow the improved free callback
mechanism that V8 uses now. All other ArrayBuffers can be transferred
between threads now, the assumption being that they were created in a
clean way that follows the V8 API on this.
This addresses a TODO comment.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30339#issuecomment-552225353
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30475
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
|
|
V8 deprecates `GetContents()` in favour of `GetBackingStore()`.
Update our code to reflect that.
V8 also deprecates `Externalize()` and `IsExternal()`; we should
be able to remove all usage of this once V8 8.0 is there.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30339
Refs: https://github.com/v8/v8/commit/bfe3d6bce734e596e312465e207bcfd55a59fe34
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
|
|
WasmModuleObject::TransferrableModule is deprecated and will be removed
in V8 v8.0. Replace all uses by CompiledWasmModule.
Refs: https://github.com/v8/node/pull/101
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30026
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
|
|
Remove custom tracking for `SharedArrayBuffer`s and their allocators
and instead let V8 do the tracking of both. This is required starting
in V8 7.9, because lifetime management for `ArrayBuffer::Allocator`s
differs from what was performed previously (i.e. it is no longer
easily possible for one Isolate to release an `ArrayBuffer` and another
to accept it into its own allocator), and the alternative would
have been adapting the `SharedArrayBuffer` tracking logic to also
apply to regular `ArrayBuffer` instances.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30044
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30020
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
|
|
Limit the number of messages processed without interruption on a
given `MessagePort` to prevent event loop starvation, but still
make sure that all messages are emitted that were already in the
queue when emitting began.
This aligns the behaviour better with the web.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28030
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/29315
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
|
|
Allow generic iterables as transfer list arguments, as well
as an options object with a `transfer` option, for web compatibility.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/29319
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28033#discussion_r289964991
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
V8 has a handle scope below each `GetSharedArrayBufferId()` call,
so using a `v8::Local` that outlives that handle scope to store
references to `SharedArrayBuffer`s is invalid and may cause accidental
de-duplication of passed `SharedArrayBuffer`s.
Use a persistent handle instead to address this issue.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/28559
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28582
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
|
Refactor the C++ code for creating `MessagePort`s to skip calling the
constructor and instead directly instantiating the `InstanceTemplate`,
and always throw an error from the `MessagePort` constructor.
This aligns behaviour with the web, and creating single `MessagePort`s
does not make sense anyway.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28032
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
If the transfer list argument is present, it should be an array.
This commit adds typechecking to that effect. This aligns behaviour
with browsers.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28033
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
|
|
This aligns the behaviour better with the web.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28025
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
|
|
Instead of using a hack to get it in the test.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28072
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
|
|
Inline headers should only be included into the .cc files that use them.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27755
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
In combination with Atomics, this makes it possible to implement
generic synchronous functionality, e.g. `importScript()`, in Workers
purely by communicating with other threads.
This is a continuation of https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26686,
where a preference for a solution was voiced that allowed reading
individual messages, rather than emitting all messages through events.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27294
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
|
|
When a `MessagePort` connected to another `MessagePort` closes, the
latter `MessagePort` will be closed as well. Until now, this is done
by testing whether the ports are still entangled after processing
messages. This leaves open a race condition window in which messages
sent just before the closure can be lost when timing is unfortunate.
(A description of the timing is in the test file.)
This can be addressed by using a special message instead, which is
the last message received by a `MessagePort`. This way, all previously
sent messages are processed first.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/22762
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27705
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
|
This is a property of the native object associated with the
`MessagePort`, not something that should be set on the
conceptual `MessagePort` that may be transferred around.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27705
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
|
Its intended that *-inl.h header files are only included into the src
files that call the inline methods. Explicitly include it into the files
that need it.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27631
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
|
FromJust() is often used not for its return value, but for its
side-effects. In these cases, Check() exists, and is more clear as to
the intent. From its comment:
To be used, where the actual value of the Maybe is not needed, like
Object::Set.
See: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26929/files#r269256335
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27162
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <zyszys98@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26564
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
|
|
This enables using `MessagePort`s in different `vm.Context`s,
aiding with the isolation that the `vm` module seeks to provide.
Refs: https://github.com/ayojs/ayo/pull/111
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26497
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
This allows using `DOMException` from Node.js code for any
`vm.Context`.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26497
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26682
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26306
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
|
|
These were causing compilation warnings.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26590
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
|
|
This aligns `MessagePort`s more with the web API.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/26463
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26487
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26340
Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
|
|
It’s not obvious why this was a heap allocation in the first place,
but it’s unneccessary. Most other `HandleWrap`s also store the
libuv handle directly.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26271
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26271
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
|
|
The current mechanism of uses two async handles, one owned by the
creator of the worker thread to terminate a running worker,
and another one employed by the worker to interrupt its creator on its
natural termination. The force termination piggybacks on the message-
passing mechanism to inform the worker to quiesce.
Also there are few flags that represent the other thread's state /
request state because certain code path is shared by multiple
control flows, and there are certain code path where the async
handles may not have come to life.
Refactor into an AsyncRequest abstraction that exposes routines to
install a handle as well as to save a state.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26099
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21283
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
|
Always use the right allocator for memory that is turned into
an `ArrayBuffer` at a later point.
This enables embedders to use their own `ArrayBuffer::Allocator`s,
and is inspired by Electron’s electron/node@f61bae3440e. It should
render their downstream patch unnecessary.
Refs: https://github.com/electron/node/commit/f61bae3440e1bfcc83bba6ff0785adfb89b4045e
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26207
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
|
|
If the `ArrayBuffer::Allocator` used to create `ArrayBuffer`s
in the current `Isolate` is not a Node.js `ArrayBufferAllocator`,
we cannot know that it is `malloc()`-based, an in particular it might
not be compatible with the `ArrayBuffer::Allocator` on the receiving
end of the connection.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26207
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26042
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Do not put the `.stop()` and `.drain()` methods on the
`MessagePort` prototype if we are going to remove them
later on anyway.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26109
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Instead of passing the payload for Workers directly to `.onmessage`,
perform something more similar to what the browser API provides,
namely create an event object with a `.data` property.
This does not make `MessagePort` implement the `EventTarget` API, nor
does it implement the full `MessageEvent` API, but it would make
such extensions non-breaking changes if we desire them at
some point in the future.
(This would be a breaking change if Workers were not experimental.
Currently, this method is also undocumented and only exists with
the idea of enabling some degree of Web compatibility.)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26082
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25916
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20914
Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
|
|
Automated tooling for race condition detection reports this as a
possible problem. It’s unlikely that something bad would happen
here (beyond maybe calling `TriggerAsync()` twice), but adding this
should be okay.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25911
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <minwoo@nodesource.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Throw a `DataCloneError` exception when encountering duplicate
`ArrayBuffer`s or `MessagePort`s in the transfer list.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/25786
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25815
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25507
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Instead of in node_internals.h. Also move process property
accessors that are not reused into node_process_object.cc
and make them static.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25397
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
|
Enable in-memory transfer of WASM modules without recompilation.
Previously, the serialization step worked, but deserialization failed
because we did not explicitly enable decoding inline WASM modules,
and so the message was not successfully received.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25314
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
|
|
This would previously always have crashed when deserializing
a `MessagePort` fails, because there was always at least one
`nullptr` entry in the vector.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25076
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23302
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch:
- Refactors the `MemoryRetainer` API so that the impementer no longer
calls `TrackThis()` that sets the size of node on the top of the
stack, which may be hard to understand. Instead now they implements
`SelfSize()` to provide their self sizes. Also documents
the API in the header.
- Refactors `MemoryTracker` so it calls `MemoryInfoName()` and
`SelfSize()` of `MemoryRetainer` to retrieve info about them, and
separate `node_names` and `edge_names` so the edges can be properly
named with reference names and the nodes can be named with class
names. (Previously the nodes are named with reference names while the
edges are all indexed and appear as array elements).
- Adds `SET_MEMORY_INFO_NAME()`, `SET_SELF_SIZE()` and
`SET_NO_MEMORY_INFO()` convenience macros
- Fixes a few `MemoryInfo` calls in some `MemoryRetainers` to track
their references properly.
- Refactors the heapdump tests to check both node names and edge names,
distinguishing between wrapped JS nodes (without prefixes)
and embedder wrappers (prefixed with `Node / `).
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23072
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
|
For all classes descending from `AsyncWrap`, use JS inheritance
instead of manually adding methods to the individual classes.
This allows cleanup of some code around transferring handles
over IPC.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23094
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
This reduces unintended exposure of internals.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23037
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Using `ASSIGN_OR_RETURN_UNWRAP` would return if the
created `MessagePort` object had no internal fields.
That would be a bug, so switch to a checked conversion instead.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23036
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
|
|
This will enable more detailed heap snapshots based on
a newer V8 API.
This commit itself is not tied to that API and could
be backported.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21742
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Extracts common setters to a single location
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21769
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <minwoo@nodesource.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
|
|
Currently, transferring the port on which postMessage is called causes a
segmentation fault, and transferring the target port causes a subsequent
port.onmessage setting to throw, or a deadlock if onmessage is set
before the postMessage. Fix both of these behaviors and align the
methods more closely with the normative definitions in the HTML
Standard.
Also, per spec postMessage must not throw just because the ports are
disentangled. Implement that behavior.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21540
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21540
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Now that we have better native debugging utilities in core,
let’s use them :)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21423
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matheus Marchini <matheus@sthima.com>
|