summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/paper
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/paper')
-rw-r--r--doc/paper/taler.tex2
-rw-r--r--doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt2
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/paper/taler.tex b/doc/paper/taler.tex
index 45eeacdf5..b462a4d69 100644
--- a/doc/paper/taler.tex
+++ b/doc/paper/taler.tex
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ and another time for refunding the remaining amount without losing anonymity.
Unfortunately this approach cannot be used for a general-purpose payment
system, since the refund operation of Rupp et al. allows transferring money
in a way that hides income from taxation. Refunding a coin into a wallet that
-didn't withdraw the coin is possible in their system, but consitutes a
+didn't withdraw the coin is possible in their system, but constitutes a
transaction between two parties that is not recognized by the system for the
purpose of income taxation.
diff --git a/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt b/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt
index f66530c68..40070be48 100644
--- a/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt
+++ b/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ Specific comments:
> We added remarks on the level of anonymity that Zerocash achieves.
> We suspect Zerocash's inherent scaling issues limit its anonymity
-> for normal purchases, as compaired to that a large Taler exchange
+> for normal purchases, as compared to that a large Taler exchange
> provides. We mention that Zerocash is likely to provide better
> anonymtiy for large transactions that do not need to be cashed out.