|author||Christian Grothoff <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2021-04-23 23:53:52 +0200|
|committer||Christian Grothoff <email@example.com>||2021-04-23 23:53:52 +0200|
fix more typos
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/paper')
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/paper/taler.tex b/doc/paper/taler.tex
index 45eeacdf..b462a4d6 100644
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ and another time for refunding the remaining amount without losing anonymity.
Unfortunately this approach cannot be used for a general-purpose payment
system, since the refund operation of Rupp et al. allows transferring money
in a way that hides income from taxation. Refunding a coin into a wallet that
-didn't withdraw the coin is possible in their system, but consitutes a
+didn't withdraw the coin is possible in their system, but constitutes a
transaction between two parties that is not recognized by the system for the
purpose of income taxation.
diff --git a/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt b/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt
index f66530c6..40070be4 100644
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ Specific comments:
> We added remarks on the level of anonymity that Zerocash achieves.
> We suspect Zerocash's inherent scaling issues limit its anonymity
-> for normal purchases, as compaired to that a large Taler exchange
+> for normal purchases, as compared to that a large Taler exchange
> provides. We mention that Zerocash is likely to provide better
> anonymtiy for large transactions that do not need to be cashed out.