1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
'use strict';
/*
* This is a regression test for https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/7722.
*
* When nested timers have the same timeout, calling clearTimeout on the
* older timer after it has fired causes the list the newer timer is in
* to be deleted. Since the newer timer was not cleared, it still blocks
* the event loop completing for the duration of its timeout, however, since
* no reference exists to it in its list, it cannot be canceled and its
* callback is not called when the timeout elapses.
*/
const common = require('../common');
const assert = require('assert');
const Timer = process.binding('timer_wrap').Timer;
const TIMEOUT = common.platformTimeout(100);
const start = Timer.now();
// This bug also prevents the erroneously dereferenced timer's callback
// from being called, so we can't use it's execution or lack thereof
// to assert that the bug is fixed.
process.on('exit', function() {
const end = Timer.now();
assert.equal(end - start < TIMEOUT * 2, true,
'Elapsed time does not include second timer\'s timeout.');
});
const handle1 = setTimeout(common.mustCall(function() {
// Cause the old TIMEOUT list to be deleted
clearTimeout(handle1);
// Cause a new list with the same key (TIMEOUT) to be created for this timer
const handle2 = setTimeout(function() {
common.fail('Inner callback is not called');
}, TIMEOUT);
setTimeout(common.mustCall(function() {
// Attempt to cancel the second timer. Fix for this bug will keep the
// newer timer from being dereferenced by keeping its list from being
// erroneously deleted. If we are able to cancel the timer successfully,
// the bug is fixed.
clearTimeout(handle2);
setImmediate(common.mustCall(function() {
setImmediate(common.mustCall(function() {
const activeHandles = process._getActiveHandles();
const activeTimers = activeHandles.filter(function(handle) {
return handle instanceof Timer;
});
// Make sure our clearTimeout succeeded. One timer finished and
// the other was canceled, so none should be active.
assert.equal(activeTimers.length, 0, 'No Timers remain.');
}));
}));
}), 10);
// Make sure our timers got added to the list.
const activeHandles = process._getActiveHandles();
const activeTimers = activeHandles.filter(function(handle) {
return handle instanceof Timer;
});
const shortTimer = activeTimers.find(function(handle) {
return handle._list.msecs === 10;
});
const longTimers = activeTimers.filter(function(handle) {
return handle._list.msecs === TIMEOUT;
});
// Make sure our clearTimeout succeeded. One timer finished and
// the other was canceled, so none should be active.
assert.equal(activeTimers.length, 3, 'There are 3 timers in the list.');
assert(shortTimer instanceof Timer, 'The shorter timer is in the list.');
assert.equal(longTimers.length, 2, 'Both longer timers are in the list.');
// When this callback completes, `listOnTimeout` should now look at the
// correct list and refrain from removing the new TIMEOUT list which
// contains the reference to the newer timer.
}), TIMEOUT);
|
