| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This commit replaces common.busyLoop() with sleep().
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30787
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
|
|
This updates a lot of comments.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26223
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
|
|
Refactor Timers to behave more similarly to Immediates by having
a single uv_timer_t handle which is stored on the Environment.
No longer expose timers in a public binding and instead make
it part of the internalBinding.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20894
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/10154
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20846
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
|
|
test-timers-blocking-callback may fail erroneously on
resource-constrained machines due to the timing nature of the test.
There is likely no way around the timing issue. This change tries to
decrease the probability of the test failing erroneously by having it
retry a small number of times on failure.
Tested on 0.10.38 (which has a bug that this test was written for) and
(modifying the test slightly to remove ES6 stuff) the test still seems
to fail 100% of the time there, which is what we want/expect.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14831
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/14792
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Manually fix issues that eslint --fix couldn't do automatically.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10685
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
Remove unneeded timers from some tests and move others from parallel
testing to sequential testing.
This is to resolve test failures on freebsd10-64 on CI. The failures
are all due to timers firing later than expected. Timers firing later
than they are set for can happen on resource-constrained hosts and is
not a bug.
In general, it may be wise to put tests that depend on timing into
sequential testing rather than parallel testing, as the timing can
be affected by other simultaneously-running test processes.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/8041
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/9227
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9317
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org>
Reviewed-By: Johan Bergstrom <bugs@bergstroem.nu>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
|
