| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27572
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/24441
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
|
|
Improve the assert error message so it includes actual value in
the error message.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21160
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
This change removes `common.noop` from the Node.js internal testing
common module.
Over the last few weeks, I've grown to dislike the `common.noop`
abstraction.
First, new (and experienced) contributors are unaware of it and so it
results in a large number of low-value nits on PRs. It also increases
the number of things newcomers and infrequent contributors have to be
aware of to be effective on the project.
Second, it is confusing. Is it a singleton/property or a getter? Which
should be expected? This can lead to subtle and hard-to-find bugs. (To
my knowledge, none have landed on master. But I also think it's only a
matter of time.)
Third, the abstraction is low-value in my opinion. What does it really
get us? A case could me made that it is without value at all.
Lastly, and this is minor, but the abstraction is wordier than not using
the abstraction. `common.noop` doesn't save anything over `() => {}`.
So, I propose removing it.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12822
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
|
|
Export a new common.noop no-operation function for general use.
Allow using common.mustCall() without a fn argument to simplify
test cases.
Replace various non-op functions throughout tests with common.noop
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12027
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
|
|
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/8684
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8914
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
|
|
In 68990948fe4 (https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/2325),
the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when
writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so
that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving
`readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0.
This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the
stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping
destination, which was likely the intention of the original
patch.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/5820
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/5257
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6023
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
