| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Reduce the number of different scopes we use for async callbacks.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30236
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Change resource being used, previously HTTParser was being reused.
We are now using IncomingMessage and ClientRequest objects. The goal
here is to make the async resource unique for each async operatio
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/24330
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/248
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21313
Co-authored-by: Matheus Marchini <mat@mmarchini.me>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25094
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benedikt Meurer <benedikt.meurer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26824
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/26776
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
At least one method on a native object is added as a getter,
namely `MessagePort.prototype.onmessage`. When a MessagePort
attempts to call this method from C++ in response to receiving
data, it will first invoke that getter and then call the function.
Since `worker.terminate()` interrupts execution, this means
that the getter may fail (without being faulty code on its own).
This means that at least one test exercising these methods in
combination has been flaky and could have crashed, because
we did not actually check that the getter returns a value
so far, resulting in dereferencing an empty `Local`.
The proper fix for this is to use the non-deprecated overload
of `Get()` and check the result like we should be doing.
Also, as a (related) fix, don’t crash if the method
is not a function but rather something else, like a getter
could provide.
Example test failure: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-linux-containered/4976/nodes=ubuntu1604_sharedlibs_zlib_x64/console
17:56:56 not ok 1955 parallel/test-worker-dns-terminate
17:56:56 ---
17:56:56 duration_ms: 1.237
17:56:56 severity: crashed
17:56:56 exitcode: -11
17:56:56 stack: |-
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21189
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
This makes the property “more” hidden when exposing a `HandleWrap`
as public API, e.g. for upcoming `MessagePort`s.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20876
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
|
|
Move v8::HandleScope call to Emit removing it from previous locations
where it was added to avoid crashing (constructor and destructor of
AsyncWrap) for a more general and fool-proof solution.
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19972#issuecomment-381353894
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20045
Reviewed-By: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
|
|
Add `HandleError`s to the AsyncScope constructor and destructor in
async_wrap-inl.h to fix "FATAL ERROR" incurring observed while running
test-http2-respond-with-file using the --trace-events-enabled flag.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/19921
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19972
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Add `AsyncScope` for cases where the async_hooks `before` and
`after` callbacks should be called, to track async context,
but no actual JS is called in between and we can therefore
skip things like draining the microtask or `nextTick` queues.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18936
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19204
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
|
|
This commit renames base-object to base_object for consitency with other
c++ source files.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/17022
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
|
|
This commit renames async-wrap to async_wrap for consitency with other
c++ source files.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/17022
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
|
