Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25461
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
|
The next-tick-exec benchmarks were meant to track nextTick execution
time but due to an error, they actually track addition and execution.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20462
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18917
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18778
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18250
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Get rid of separate function to call callback from _tickCallback as
it no longer yields worthwhile performance improvement.
Move some code from nextTick & internalNextTick into TickObject
constructor to minimize duplication.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/16888
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
|