deps: copy all openssl header files to include dir

On upgrading openssl, all symlinks in pulic header files are replaced
with nested include files. The issue was raised that installing them
leads to lost its references to real header files.
To avoid this, all public header files are copied into the
`deps/openssl/openssl/include/openssl/` directory.
As a result, we have duplicated header files under
`deps/openssl/openssl/` but copied files are refereed in build as
specified to include path in openssl.gyp.

Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/io.js/pull/1975
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/io.js/pull/2016
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu>

1 files changed, 97 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/deps/openssl/openssl/include/openssl/opensslv.h b/deps/openssl/openssl/include/openssl/opensslv.h
index c39a0c3882..7cc19dc510 100644
--- a/deps/openssl/openssl/include/openssl/opensslv.h
+++ b/deps/openssl/openssl/include/openssl/opensslv.h
@@ -1 +1,97 @@
-#include "../../crypto/opensslv.h"
+#ifndef HEADER_OPENSSLV_H
+# define HEADER_OPENSSLV_H
+
+#ifdef  __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
+/*-
+ * Numeric release version identifier:
+ * MNNFFPPS: major minor fix patch status
+ * The status nibble has one of the values 0 for development, 1 to e for betas
+ * 1 to 14, and f for release.  The patch level is exactly that.
+ * For example:
+ * 0.9.3-dev      0x00903000
+ * 0.9.3-beta1    0x00903001
+ * 0.9.3-beta2-dev 0x00903002
+ * 0.9.3-beta2    0x00903002 (same as ...beta2-dev)
+ * 0.9.3          0x0090300f
+ * 0.9.3a         0x0090301f
+ * 0.9.4          0x0090400f
+ * 1.2.3z         0x102031af
+ *
+ * For continuity reasons (because 0.9.5 is already out, and is coded
+ * 0x00905100), between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6 the coding of the patch level
+ * part is slightly different, by setting the highest bit.  This means
+ * that 0.9.5a looks like this: 0x0090581f.  At 0.9.6, we can start
+ * with 0x0090600S...
+ *
+ * (Prior to 0.9.3-dev a different scheme was used: 0.9.2b is 0x0922.)
+ * (Prior to 0.9.5a beta1, a different scheme was used: MMNNFFRBB for
+ *  major minor fix final patch/beta)
+ */
+# define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER  0x1000203fL
+# ifdef OPENSSL_FIPS
+#  define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT    "OpenSSL 1.0.2c-fips 12 Jun 2015"
+# else
+#  define OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT    "OpenSSL 1.0.2c 12 Jun 2015"
+# endif
+# define OPENSSL_VERSION_PTEXT   " part of " OPENSSL_VERSION_TEXT
+
+/*-
+ * The macros below are to be used for shared library (.so, .dll, ...)
+ * versioning.  That kind of versioning works a bit differently between
+ * operating systems.  The most usual scheme is to set a major and a minor
+ * number, and have the runtime loader check that the major number is equal
+ * to what it was at application link time, while the minor number has to
+ * be greater or equal to what it was at application link time.  With this
+ * scheme, the version number is usually part of the file name, like this:
+ *
+ *      libcrypto.so.0.9
+ *
+ * Some unixen also make a softlink with the major verson number only:
+ *
+ *      libcrypto.so.0
+ *
+ * On Tru64 and IRIX 6.x it works a little bit differently.  There, the
+ * shared library version is stored in the file, and is actually a series
+ * of versions, separated by colons.  The rightmost version present in the
+ * library when linking an application is stored in the application to be
+ * matched at run time.  When the application is run, a check is done to
+ * see if the library version stored in the application matches any of the
+ * versions in the version string of the library itself.
+ * This version string can be constructed in any way, depending on what
+ * kind of matching is desired.  However, to implement the same scheme as
+ * the one used in the other unixen, all compatible versions, from lowest
+ * to highest, should be part of the string.  Consecutive builds would
+ * give the following versions strings:
+ *
+ *      3.0
+ *      3.0:3.1
+ *      3.0:3.1:3.2
+ *      4.0
+ *      4.0:4.1
+ *
+ * Notice how version 4 is completely incompatible with version, and
+ * therefore give the breach you can see.
+ *
+ * There may be other schemes as well that I haven't yet discovered.
+ *
+ * So, here's the way it works here: first of all, the library version
+ * number doesn't need at all to match the overall OpenSSL version.
+ * However, it's nice and more understandable if it actually does.
+ * The current library version is stored in the macro SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER,
+ * which is just a piece of text in the format "M.m.e" (Major, minor, edit).
+ * For the sake of Tru64, IRIX, and any other OS that behaves in similar ways,
+ * we need to keep a history of version numbers, which is done in the
+ * macro SHLIB_VERSION_HISTORY.  The numbers are separated by colons and
+ * should only keep the versions that are binary compatible with the current.
+ */
+# define SHLIB_VERSION_HISTORY ""
+# define SHLIB_VERSION_NUMBER "1.0.0"
+
+
+#ifdef  __cplusplus
+}
+#endif
+#endif                          /* HEADER_OPENSSLV_H */