taler-www

Main taler.net website
Log | Files | Refs | Submodules | README | LICENSE

commit 957bc36632b4fda62fc20c13f4bb0c1380f3a4d7
parent cb4066e742c4e1df9f31654738d468ffbaffc932
Author: Mikolai Gütschow <mikolai.guetschow@tu-dresden.de>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:44:01 +0100

news: add news entry about Digital Euro paper

Diffstat:
Mproperties.yml | 3+++
Atemplate/news/2026-02.html.j2 | 25+++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/properties.yml b/properties.yml @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ eventslist: speaker: Christian Grothoff email: cg'AT'taler.net newsposts: + - page: 2026-02.html + date: 2026-01-14 + title: "Critical analysis of digital euro published" - page: 2025-04.html date: 2026-01-06 title: "P15 CoNetWorking Space accepts GNU Taler payments in eCHF" diff --git a/template/news/2026-02.html.j2 b/template/news/2026-02.html.j2 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +{% extends "common/news.j2" %} +{% block body_content %} + +<h1>Critical analysis of digital euro published</h1> +<br/> +<p>The Springer journal "Digital Finance" has recently published "The proposed design of the digital euro: A critical analysis" by Mikolai Gütschow and Bernd Lucke. +They describe serious flaws in the digital euro design as proposed by the European Commission and propose GNU Taler as an alternative technology for a potential CBDC with tangible benefits for Europeans.</p> + +<p>The text is available under open-access as <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-025-00171-2">DOI 10.1007/s42521-025-00171-2</a>. The abstract reads as follows:</p> + +<p style="margin: 2em;">We analyse the Commission’s draft regulation for the establishment of the digital euro (DE). +While well-intentioned, the design proposed by the Commission exhibits serious flaws. +In particular, both the offline and the online versions of the DE show clear disadvantages compared with cash +and online commercial bank money, respectively—for example, severe limitations on the store-of-value function of digital euros and strict holding limits unknown in current forms of money. +There is essentially no discernible benefit to customers. +Privacy remains comparable to current private payment systems, yet concerns persist about potential user re-identification at the central level. +Competition, innovation, and trust are greatly undermined by the use of proprietary rather than open-source software. +The enforcement of mandatory acceptance places competing means of payment at a disadvantage, even when technologically superior. +The DE also distorts competition between banks and non-banks, as DE issuance and basic services are costly and unprofitable for banks. +Banks may therefore resort to issuing a DE-based stablecoin that would be superior to the DE for both customers and banks, thereby undermining the ECB’s control over monetary policy. +We show how these flaws can be addressed and outline an improved design for a European CBDC based on open software and elements of blockchain technology.</p> + +<p><a href="https://link.springer.com/journal/42521">Digital Finance</a> is a leading journal exploring cutting-edge research in digital financial technologies and their impact on the financial industry.</p> + +{% endblock body_content %}