marketing

commit abf88cd8030b3cdf5df4348c05c21bf8c24312c0
parent b6e7fda1caf0f420e85c0506d3793285fb023d74
Author: Florian Dold <florian@dold.me>
Date:   Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:46:20 +0200

add link

Diffstat:
M
2021-taler-vs-lightning/taler-vs-lightning.md
 | 
2
++

1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/2021-taler-vs-lightning/taler-vs-lightning.md b/2021-taler-vs-lightning/taler-vs-lightning.md
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ Problems:
 * Fraud attempts are possible, and need to be resolved via
   a complex penalty system if channels are force-closed
   without taking the latest allocation of funds into account
+* The implementation is not yet battle-tested [3]
 
 ## Taler with blockchain adapter
 
@@ -68,3 +69,4 @@ with Blockchain or any other lower-level settlement layer.
 
 [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12470
 [2] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/aba062
+[3] https://news.bitcoin.com/lightning-network-exploits-continue-to-hinder-the-bitcoin-scaling-solution/