marketing

commit 84d397b31f9888c10c5b28addf863f0da4c0eb19
parent c050b6e2d621d8f714b6264aa3aaeb3ac7e20f61
Author: Florian Dold <florian@dold.me>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:22:05 +0100

improve wording

Diffstat:
M
2021-offline/offline.tex
 | 
4
++--

1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/2021-offline/offline.tex b/2021-offline/offline.tex
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ is online-only.
 \section{Conclusion}
 
 While in some situations, offline payments might be a desireable requirement,
-adding offline capabilities to a payment system comes with substantial risks.
+adding offline payment systems have inherent and severe risks.
 The exposure to these risks should be limited by only resorting to an offline
 fallback mode of the payment system when actually required.
 
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ exposing the payee to counterparty risk.  In a system based on restricted
 hardware elements, the payee would bear the risk in case of a compromised
 hardware system.  In a system based on identifying offline double spenders /
 cheaters, the payee would bear the risk in case the offline double spender /
-cheater can't be found and held accountable.
+cheater cannot be found and held accountable.
 
 Preliminary results from a survey done by the ECB have shown that privacy is
 regarded as one of the the most important feature by participants among