commit 7bbd75976cae7e379961d2bf465404bbd455fb2d
parent f1e4f769d20234fbab6acfcc300b9b58bb43fd78
Author: Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:18:52 +0100
discussion with Martin
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/2022-privacy/privacy.tex b/2022-privacy/privacy.tex
@@ -106,11 +106,13 @@ of privacy, when this is false.
Since this far-fetched assumption is taken as true while counterexamples
exists, the conclusion of the first part of the French report follows a logical fallacy.
In it, the authors ask ``Should the objectives, mandate and governance of central banks be redefined?'',
-implying that the management of a CBDC would be impossible in the current
+% FIXME: this is a bad quote, we should quote not a question on 'should',
+% but their specific conclusion THAT the mandate needs a redefinition (if they make such a conclusion).
+implying that the deployment of a CBDC would be impossible in the current
state.
But adaptations of central bank missions to
include complete control over money via the issuance of a CBDC (as envisioned
-by Agustin Carstens of the Bank of International Settlement\footnote{ See
+by Agustin Carstens of the Bank of International Settlement\footnote{See
speach given on October 19th 2020 on ``Cross-Border Payment -- A vision for
the future''}) are dangerous and must be firmly rejected. %MSC: Citation needed? Unfounded claim?
