marketing

commit 4c5ee84654dbbb3296f89c4b58cd6a73865d557b
parent cc2c73ae960bf6ea6a82d2fb76850d7917ede3b1
Author: Florian Dold <florian@dold.me>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 11:52:49 +0100

-wording

Diffstat:
M
presentations/comprehensive/sic.tex
 | 
4
++--

1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/presentations/comprehensive/sic.tex b/presentations/comprehensive/sic.tex
@@ -2227,7 +2227,7 @@ Searching for functions \uncover<2->{with the following signatures}
   $C$ and that the exchange thus must pay $M$.
   \vfill
   \begin{center}
-     Without this, an evil exchange could renege on the deposit
+     Without this, a malicious exchange could renege on the deposit
      confirmation and claim double-spending if a coin were
      deposited twice, and then not pay either merchant!
   \end{center}
@@ -2353,7 +2353,7 @@ online signing keys, if we find they have been compromised.
       that the exchange did not honor the (faked) deposit confirmations.
 \end{itemize}
 The auditor can then detect the double-spending, but cannot tell who is to blame,
-and (likely) would presume an evil exchange, forcing it to pay both merchants.
+and (likely) would presume a malicious exchange, forcing it to pay both merchants.
 \end{frame}