marketing

Marketing materials (presentations, posters, flyers)
Log | Files | Refs

commit 4422cfc3edd63bb45c541d098da8b6db780fe7a4
parent 5a2e99f27e8decac4165bad5fc5834c413fc2889
Author: Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:28:54 +0100

typos, thanks MS

Diffstat:
Mecb/answers.txt | 4++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ecb/answers.txt b/ecb/answers.txt @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ digital Euro ## Answer: We see a limited use for "smart contracts". Here, most likely very few -well-defined build-in contracts (such as currency trading and +well-defined built-in contracts (such as currency trading and privacy-preserving digital auctions, as proposed by Prof. Brandt (TUM)) could be useful. A Turing-complete general smart contract runtime would likely be too slow, too generic, too insecure and most importantly lead to digital @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ payments? ## Answer We do not see an urgent need for cross-currency payments, this creates -mostly economic and political hazzards. However, what is important is +mostly economic and political hazards. However, what is important is that a global standard is created, and that consumers can carry balances in various currencies in their unified digital wallet. To create such a global standard, a patent-free Free Software approach is crucial, as