summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt')
-rw-r--r--doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt b/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt
index 80e590c38..176e9c750 100644
--- a/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt
+++ b/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ is less a currency and more an open protocol for creating new
currencies. So what? And why do altcoins become a ponzi scheme? (Noting
that you do not say that they might become one, rather that they do).
-> We have adjusted that langauge, as some like Dogecoin have removed
+> We have adjusted that language, as some like Dogecoin have removed
> the 21 billion BTC cap to reduce the ponzi-like tendencies.
> There remains a large trend towards ponzi schemes in the altcoin
> world however, amusingly noted by https://ponzico.win/ and
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ scheme suggests that a any transfers of value should be taxed. However,
the issuing protocol in 4.1 can be abused to transfer a coin, without
paying tax, and in an unlikable manner.
-> Technically 4.1 is not transfering a coin, as it is issuing a coin.
+> Technically 4.1 is not transferring a coin, as it is issuing a coin.
> Again, the loophole is/was discussed in the paper.
The party withdrawing the coin