| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Related: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/26122
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26123
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Instead of passing the payload for Workers directly to `.onmessage`,
perform something more similar to what the browser API provides,
namely create an event object with a `.data` property.
This does not make `MessagePort` implement the `EventTarget` API, nor
does it implement the full `MessageEvent` API, but it would make
such extensions non-breaking changes if we desire them at
some point in the future.
(This would be a breaking change if Workers were not experimental.
Currently, this method is also undocumented and only exists with
the idea of enabling some degree of Web compatibility.)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26082
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
|
|
Having an experimental feature behind a flag makes change
if we are expecting significant breaking changes to its API.
Since the Worker API has been essentially stable since
its initial introduction, and no noticeable doubt about
possibly not keeping the feature around has been voiced,
removing the flag and thereby reducing the barrier to experimentation,
and consequently receiving feedback on the implementation,
seems like a good idea.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25361
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me>
Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
|
|
These tests have been added after the original workers PR and
time out when run inside a worker by themselves.
This is needed for enabling `--worker` tests in our regular CI.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/1318
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21791
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/21510
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
