| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In #26059, we introduced a bug that caused 'readable' to be nextTicked
on EOF of a ReadableStream. This breaks the dicer module on CITGM.
That change was partially reverted to still fix the bug in #25810 and
not break dicer.
See: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26059
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/25810
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26643
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26483
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
|
|
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/25810
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26059
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
|
|
Emit 'readable' always in the next tick, resulting in a single
call to _read() per microtick. This removes the need for the
user to implement buffering if they wanted to call this.push()
multiple times in an asynchronous fashion, as this.push() triggers
this._read() call.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/17979
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/3203
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
|
|
This change removes `common.noop` from the Node.js internal testing
common module.
Over the last few weeks, I've grown to dislike the `common.noop`
abstraction.
First, new (and experienced) contributors are unaware of it and so it
results in a large number of low-value nits on PRs. It also increases
the number of things newcomers and infrequent contributors have to be
aware of to be effective on the project.
Second, it is confusing. Is it a singleton/property or a getter? Which
should be expected? This can lead to subtle and hard-to-find bugs. (To
my knowledge, none have landed on master. But I also think it's only a
matter of time.)
Third, the abstraction is low-value in my opinion. What does it really
get us? A case could me made that it is without value at all.
Lastly, and this is minor, but the abstraction is wordier than not using
the abstraction. `common.noop` doesn't save anything over `() => {}`.
So, I propose removing it.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12822
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
|
|
Export a new common.noop no-operation function for general use.
Allow using common.mustCall() without a fn argument to simplify
test cases.
Replace various non-op functions throughout tests with common.noop
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12027
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
|
|
Part of #8683, increase coverage of the internal
state machine of streams.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10249
See: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/8683
See: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/10230
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
|
