| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This activates the eslint capitalize comment rule for comments
above 50 characters.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/24996
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <usharma1998@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Remove a couple of obsolete checks by refactoring the code with else.
Also remove the possibility of an undefined warning. That is neither
documented nor does it result in a usable warning.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20726
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
There is actually no reason to use `assert.doesNotThrow()` in the
tests. If a test throws, just let the error bubble up right away
instead of first catching it and then rethrowing it.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18669
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14162
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Wrap expectsError in mustCall to make sure it's really called
as expected.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14088
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
|
|
* Remove needless RegExp flag
In fixed case, `/g` flag is needless in the boolean context.
* Remove needless RegExp capturing
Use non-capturing grouping or remove capturing completely when:
* capturing is useless per se, e.g. in test() check;
* captured groups are not used afterward at all;
* some of the later captured groups are not used afterward.
* Use test, not match/exec in boolean context
match() and exec() return a complicated object,
unneeded in a boolean context.
* Do not needlessly repeat RegExp creation
This commit takes RegExp creation out of cycles and other repetitions.
As long as the RegExp does not use /g flag and match indices,
we are safe here.
In tests, this fix hardly gives a significant performance gain,
but it increases clarity and maintainability,
reassuring some RegExps to be identical.
RegExp in functions are not taken out of their functions:
while these functions are called many times
and their RegExps are recreated with each call,
the performance gain in test cases
does not seem to be worth decreasing function self-dependency.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13770
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
|
Adds a new method signature variant for process.emitWarning()
that accepts an options object. The options object may include
a new `detail` option that allows additional detail text to be
associated with the warning. By default, this additional text
will be printed to stderr along with the warning, and included
on the Warning Error object using the `.detail` property.
e.g.
```js
process.emitWarning('A message', {
code: 'WARNING123',
detail: 'This is additional detail'
});
// Emits:
// (node {pid}) [WARNING123] Warning: A message
// This is additional detail
```
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12725
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
|
* Assign codes to the handful of errors reported by
internal/process/*.js
* Include documentation for the new error codes
* Improve error messages
* Improve test coverage for process.nextTick
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11294
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11273
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
|
|
Add the ability to assign an optional code to process warnings +
add additional type checking to ensure that names and codes can
only be strings.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10116
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Michal Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor.indutny@gmail.com>
|
|
Previously our tests did not check these codepaths as seen at
coverage.nodejs.org
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/9556
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
|
In several places throughout the code we write directly to stderr
to report warnings (deprecation, possible eventemitter memory leak).
The current design of simply dumping the text to stderr is less
than ideal. This PR introduces a new "process warnings" mechanism
that emits 'warning' events on the global process object. These are
invoked with a `warning` argument whose value is an Error object.
By default, these warnings will be printed to stderr. This can be
suppressed using the `--no-warnings` and `--no-deprecation` command
line flags. For warnings, the 'warning' event will still be emitted
by the process, allowing applications to handle the warnings in custom
ways. The existing `--no-deprecation` flag will continue to supress
all deprecation output generated by the core lib.
The `--trace-warnings` command line flag will tell Node.js to print
the full stack trace of warnings as part of the default handling.
The existing `--no-deprecation`, `--throw-deprecation` and
`--trace-deprecation` flags continue to work as they currently do,
but the exact output of the warning message is modified to occur
on process.nextTick().
The stack trace for the warnings and deprecations preserve and point
to the correct call site.
A new `process.emitWarning()` API is provided to permit userland
to emit warnings and deprecations using the same consistent
mechanism.
Test cases and documentation are included.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/4782
Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Reviewed-By: Wyatt Preul <wpreul@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
|
