| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This change removes `common.noop` from the Node.js internal testing
common module.
Over the last few weeks, I've grown to dislike the `common.noop`
abstraction.
First, new (and experienced) contributors are unaware of it and so it
results in a large number of low-value nits on PRs. It also increases
the number of things newcomers and infrequent contributors have to be
aware of to be effective on the project.
Second, it is confusing. Is it a singleton/property or a getter? Which
should be expected? This can lead to subtle and hard-to-find bugs. (To
my knowledge, none have landed on master. But I also think it's only a
matter of time.)
Third, the abstraction is low-value in my opinion. What does it really
get us? A case could me made that it is without value at all.
Lastly, and this is minor, but the abstraction is wordier than not using
the abstraction. `common.noop` doesn't save anything over `() => {}`.
So, I propose removing it.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12822
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
|
|
Export a new common.noop no-operation function for general use.
Allow using common.mustCall() without a fn argument to simplify
test cases.
Replace various non-op functions throughout tests with common.noop
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12027
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
|
|
* test else path in emitMany function
* test calling removeAllListeners() in a event emitter instance
with no events at all
* test calling removeListener() passing a event type that does
not exist
* test calling eventNames() in a event emitter instance
with no events at all
Refs: https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-ba776b3a56642d4c/root/events.js.html
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10947
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
|
|
In preparation for a lint rule that disallows empty lines at the end of
a file, remove such lines from a number of test files.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/8918
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/8920
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ilkka Myller <ilkka.myller@nodefield.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
|
|
This commit safely allows event names that are named the same as
properties that are ordinarily inherited from Object.prototype such
as __proto__.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/728
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/6092
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
