| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26849
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26483
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
|
|
This makes a effort to make sure all of these errors will actually
also show the received input.
On top of that it refactors a few tests for better maintainability.
It will also change the returned type to always be a simple typeof
instead of special handling null.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/19445
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
|
|
The initials of expected in TypeError[ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE]
are inconsistent. This change is to unify them.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/16401
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/16383
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
|
|
In addition refactor common.throws to common.expectsError
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13829
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11273
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
|
|
replace string concatenation in test/parallel/test-child-process-constructor.js
with template literals
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14283
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14009
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11273
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13857
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
|
|
* Remove needless RegExp flag
In fixed case, `/g` flag is needless in the boolean context.
* Remove needless RegExp capturing
Use non-capturing grouping or remove capturing completely when:
* capturing is useless per se, e.g. in test() check;
* captured groups are not used afterward at all;
* some of the later captured groups are not used afterward.
* Use test, not match/exec in boolean context
match() and exec() return a complicated object,
unneeded in a boolean context.
* Do not needlessly repeat RegExp creation
This commit takes RegExp creation out of cycles and other repetitions.
As long as the RegExp does not use /g flag and match indices,
we are safe here.
In tests, this fix hardly gives a significant performance gain,
but it increases clarity and maintainability,
reassuring some RegExps to be identical.
RegExp in functions are not taken out of their functions:
while these functions are called many times
and their RegExps are recreated with each call,
the performance gain in test cases
does not seem to be worth decreasing function self-dependency.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13770
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11300
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11273
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
|
|
This commit improves input validation for the ChildProcess
internals. It became officially supported API a while back, but
never had any validation.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/12177
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12348
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/12348
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
|
|
Manually fix issues that eslint --fix couldn't do automatically.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10685
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10550
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
|
|
Change all assert.equal() to use assert.strictEqual().
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10060
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
|
|
common.js needs to be loaded in all tests so that there is checking
for variable leaks and possibly other things. However, it does not
need to be assigned to a variable if nothing in common.js is referred
to elsewhere in the test.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/4408
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Creates two new internal modules (child_process and socket_list) for
better readability.
Exposes the ChildProcess constructor from the child_process module so
one can now `require(‘child_process’).ChildProcess`
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/io.js/issues/1751
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/io.js/pull/1760
Reviewed-By: Chris Dickinson <christopher.s.dickinson@gmail.com>
|
