| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
While it doesn't make any difference now. In the future PromiseHooks
could be refactored to provide an asyncId instead of the promise object.
That would make escape analysis on promises possible.
Escape analysis on promises could lead to a more efficient destroy hook,
if provide by PromiseHooks as well. But at the very least would allow
the destroy hook to be emitted earlier. The destroy hook not being
emitted on promises frequent enough is a known and reported issue.
See https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/14446 and
https://github.com/Jeff-Lewis/cls-hooked/issues/11.
While all this is speculation for now, it all depends on the promise
object not being a part of the PromiseWrap resource object.
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/14446
Ref: https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/188
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23443
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/14446
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/188
Reviewed-By: Benedikt Meurer <benedikt.meurer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: George Adams <george.adams@uk.ibm.com>
|
|
Enable running tests inside workers by passing `--worker`
to `tools/test.py`. A number of tests are marked as skipped,
or have been slightly altered to fit the different environment.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20876
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
|
|
Rename the `parentId` property on the PromiseWrap object to a
`isChainedPromise` property. The former wasn't quite useful as it was
always defined to be the same value as the trigger id available in the
init hook. Instead rename the property to be closer to the information
it communicates: whether the promise is a chained promise or not.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/18633
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/18470
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
|
|
Add a `promiseResolve()` hook.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/15296
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14162
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Use `PromiseWrap` resource objects whose lifetimes are tied to
the `Promise` instances themselves to track promises, and have
a `.promise` getter that points to the `Promise` and a `.parent`
property that points to the parent Promise’s resource object,
if there is any.
The properties are implemented as getters for internal fields
rather than normal properties in the hope that it helps keep
performance for the common case that async_hooks users will
often not inspect them.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/13452
Reviewed-By: Andreas Madsen <amwebdk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
|
