Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
It's likely that anyone using `process.report.getReport()` will be
processing the return value thereafter (e.g., filtering fields or
redacting secrets). This change eliminates boilerplate by calling
`JSON.parse()` on the return value.
Also modified the `validateContent()` and `validate()` test helpers in
`test/common/report.js` to be somewhat more obvious and helpful. Of
note, a report failing validation will now be easier (though still not
_easy_) to read when prepended to the stack trace.
- Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics/issues/315
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28630
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
|
|
Allow loading add-ons from multiple Node.js instances if they are
declared context-aware; in particular, this applies to N-API addons.
Also, plug a memory leak that occurred when registering N-API addons.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23319
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26175
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/21481
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/21783
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/25662
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/20239
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
|
|
Currently, there are a number of compiler warnings generated when
building the addons on Linux, for example:
make[1]: Entering directory '/node/test/addons/zlib-binding/build'
CXX(target) Release/obj.target/binding/binding.o
SOLINK_MODULE(target) Release/obj.target/binding.node
COPY Release/binding.node
make[1]: Leaving directory '/node/test/addons/zlib-binding/build'
In file included from ../binding.cc:1:
/node/src/node.h:515:51: warning:
cast between incompatible function types from
'void (*)(v8::Local<v8::Object>,
v8::Local<v8::Value>,
v8::Local<v8::Context>)' to
'node::addon_context_register_func' {aka
'void (*)(v8::Local<v8::Object>,
v8::Local<v8::Value>,
v8::Local<v8::Context>,
void*)'} [-Wcast-function-type]
(node::addon_context_register_func) (regfunc), \
^
/node/src/node.h:533:3:
note: in expansion of macro 'NODE_MODULE_CONTEXT_AWARE_X'
NODE_MODULE_CONTEXT_AWARE_X(modname, regfunc, NULL, 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../binding.cc:58:1:
note: in expansion of macro 'NODE_MODULE_CONTEXT_AWARE'
NODE_MODULE_CONTEXT_AWARE(NODE_GYP_MODULE_NAME, Initialize)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This commit adds the flag -Wno-cast-function-type to suppress these
warnings. With this change the warnings are not displayed anymore and
the output matches that of osx when running
'make -j8 test/addons/.buildstamp'.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25663
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
|
|
Unloading native addons from the main thread was an (presumably
unintended) significant breaking change, because addons may
rely on their memory being available after an `Environment` exits.
This patch only restricts this to Worker threads, at least for the
time being, and thus matches the behaviour from
https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23319.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25577
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/24861
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23319
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
|
|
Having an experimental feature behind a flag makes change
if we are expecting significant breaking changes to its API.
Since the Worker API has been essentially stable since
its initial introduction, and no noticeable doubt about
possibly not keeping the feature around has been voiced,
removing the flag and thereby reducing the barrier to experimentation,
and consequently receiving feedback on the implementation,
seems like a good idea.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25361
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@hiroppy.me>
Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <starkwang@126.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
|
|
Originally from portions of https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23319/.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/24861
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
|