Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Allow specifying resource limits for the JS engine instance created
as part of a Worker.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26628
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <franziska.hinkelmann@gmail.com>
|
|
In combination with Atomics, this makes it possible to implement
generic synchronous functionality, e.g. `importScript()`, in Workers
purely by communicating with other threads.
This is a continuation of https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26686,
where a preference for a solution was voiced that allowed reading
individual messages, rather than emitting all messages through events.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27294
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
|
|
Instead of sharing the OS-backed store for all `process.env` instances,
create a copy of `process.env` for every worker that is created.
The copies do not interact. Native-addons do not see modifications to
`process.env` from Worker threads, but child processes started from
Workers do default to the Worker’s copy of `process.env`.
This makes Workers behave like child processes as far as `process.env`
is concerned, and an option corresponding to the `child_process`
module’s `env` option is added to the constructor.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/24947
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26544
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <zyszys98@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
|
|
This enables using `MessagePort`s in different `vm.Context`s,
aiding with the isolation that the `vm` module seeks to provide.
Refs: https://github.com/ayojs/ayo/pull/111
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26497
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/25765
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25768
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
- Move `setupProcessStdio` which contains write access to
the process object into `bootstrap/node.js`
- Move `MessagePort`, `MessageChannel`, `ReadableWorkerStdio`,
and `WritableWorkerStdio` into `internal/worker/io.js`
- Move more worker-specific bootstrap code into
`internal/process/worker_thread_only` from `setupChild`
in `internal/worker.js`, and move the `process._fatalException`
overwrite into `bootstrap/node.js` for clarity.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25199
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
|
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/20876
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host>
|