diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/ia64.S')
| -rw-r--r-- | deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/ia64.S | 15 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/ia64.S b/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/ia64.S index a9a42abfc3..f2404a3c1e 100644 --- a/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/ia64.S +++ b/deps/openssl/openssl/crypto/bn/asm/ia64.S @@ -3,6 +3,13 @@ .ident "ia64.S, Version 2.1" .ident "IA-64 ISA artwork by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se>" +// Copyright 2001-2016 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved. +// +// Licensed under the OpenSSL license (the "License"). You may not use +// this file except in compliance with the License. You can obtain a copy +// in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at +// https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html + // // ==================================================================== // Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@fy.chalmers.se> for the OpenSSL @@ -22,7 +29,7 @@ // ports is the same, i.e. 2, while I need 4. In other words, to this // module Itanium2 remains effectively as "wide" as Itanium. Yet it's // essentially different in respect to this module, and a re-tune was -// required. Well, because some intruction latencies has changed. Most +// required. Well, because some instruction latencies has changed. Most // noticeably those intensively used: // // Itanium Itanium2 @@ -363,7 +370,7 @@ bn_mul_words: // The loop therefore spins at the latency of xma minus 1, or in other // words at 6*(n+4) ticks:-( Compare to the "production" loop above // that runs in 2*(n+11) where the low latency problem is worked around -// by moving the dependency to one-tick latent interger ALU. Note that +// by moving the dependency to one-tick latent integer ALU. Note that // "distance" between ldf8 and xma is not latency of ldf8, but the // *difference* between xma and ldf8 latencies. .L_bn_mul_words_ctop: @@ -425,7 +432,7 @@ bn_mul_add_words: // version was performing *all* additions in IALU and was starving // for those even on Itanium 2. In this version one addition is // moved to FPU and is folded with multiplication. This is at cost -// of propogating the result from previous call to this subroutine +// of propagating the result from previous call to this subroutine // to L2 cache... In other words negligible even for shorter keys. // *Overall* performance improvement [over previous version] varies // from 11 to 22 percent depending on key length. @@ -495,7 +502,7 @@ bn_sqr_words: // scalability. The decision will very likely be reconsidered after the // benchmark program is profiled. I.e. if perfomance gain on Itanium // will appear larger than loss on "wider" IA-64, then the loop should -// be explicitely split and the epilogue compressed. +// be explicitly split and the epilogue compressed. .L_bn_sqr_words_ctop: { .mfi; (p16) ldf8 f32=[r33],8 (p25) xmpy.lu f42=f41,f41 |