taler-docs

Documentation for GNU Taler components, APIs and protocols
Log | Files | Refs | README | LICENSE

commit 7df646855907cfe68e3fcceca64c83e4a296688f
parent b0bba207481826b1503288ccbddb924125d82ea9
Author: Jeff Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>
Date:   Mon,  2 Nov 2015 17:15:53 +0100

Minor correction and cross linking

Diffstat:
Mapi-merchant.rst | 4++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/api-merchant.rst b/api-merchant.rst @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ The following API are made available by the merchant's `backend` to the merchant :reqheader Content-Type: application/json - The `frontend` passes the deposit permission received from the wallet, by adding the field `max_fee` (see `contract`) and optionally adding a field named `edate`, indicating a deadline by which he would expect to receive the bank transfer for this deal + The `frontend` passes the deposit permission received from the wallet, by adding the field `max_fee` (see :ref:`contract`) and optionally adding a field named `edate`, indicating a deadline by which he would expect to receive the bank transfer for this deal **Success Response: OK** @@ -481,5 +481,5 @@ The following API are made available by the merchant's `backend` to the merchant **Failure Responses:** - The `backend` will return error codes received from the mint verbatim (see `/deposit` documentation for the mint API for possible errors). If the wallet made a mistake, like by double-spending for example, the `frontend` should pass the reply verbatim to the browser/wallet. This should be the expected case, as the `frontend` cannot really make mistakes; the only reasonable exception is if the `backend` is unavailable, in which case the customer might appreciate some reassurance that the merchant is working on getting his systems back online. + The `backend` will return verbatim the error codes received from the mint's :ref:`deposit` API. If the wallet made a mistake, like by double-spending for example, the `frontend` should pass the reply verbatim to the browser/wallet. This should be the expected case, as the `frontend` cannot really make mistakes; the only reasonable exception is if the `backend` is unavailable, in which case the customer might appreciate some reassurance that the merchant is working on getting his systems back online.