taler-docs

Documentation for GNU Taler components, APIs and protocols
Log | Files | Refs | README | LICENSE

commit 7bdff12a38e5276dd5438013337fd2702a56597e
parent 8c15fb22511d8d536190aaddb720a8de82b3a8a3
Author: Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org>
Date:   Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:17:15 +0100

update DD23 requirements

Diffstat:
Mdesign-documents/023-taler-kyc.rst | 17+++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/design-documents/023-taler-kyc.rst b/design-documents/023-taler-kyc.rst @@ -49,9 +49,11 @@ There are many different possible KYC/AML flows: * In-person validation by AML staff * Validation involving local authorities and post-office * Online validation + * Forms to be supplied by user * Interactive video * Documents to be supplied + * Forms to be filled by AML staff Additionally, the process is dynamic and conditional upon various decisions: @@ -89,6 +91,21 @@ disclosed). Proposed Solution ================= +We allow certain **conditions** to trigger a single specific **measures**. +For the different measures, we define: + +* Who has to do something (AML staff, user, nobody) +* The specific operational mode (normal, held on staff, held on user, frozen) + the account is to transition to +* What to show to the user (normal, information required, pending, etc.) +* For a user: + + * Web page template with instructions to render + * The check to run (if any) and measures on failure + * An external helper to run on success to determine the next measure + based on data provided in the measure + + Terminology ^^^^^^^^^^^