commit 80ef0b79f121db0da447b08122c7d44a0854f809
parent 9d522079f4b15ccc7a98b2945d5acc84e86debc8
Author: Christian Grothoff <christian@grothoff.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:35:24 +0100
corrections
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/frontend_blog/index.html b/src/frontend_blog/index.html
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Gakuin University
<li><a name="stoc-What_0027s-in-a-Name_003f" href="/essay_offer.php?article=scrap1_12"><h3>12. What’s in a Name?</h3></a><div class="teasers_item"><p>Names convey meanings; our choice of names determines the meaning of what we say. An inappropriate name gives people the wrong idea. A rose by any other name would smell as sweet—but if you call it a pen, people will be rather disappointed when they try to write with it. And if you call pens “roses,” people may not realize what they are good for. If you call our operating system Linux, that conveys a mistaken idea of the system’s origin, history, and purpose. If you call it GNU/Linux, that conveys (though not in detail) an accurate idea. </p></div></li>
<li><a name="stoc-Categories-of-Free-and-Nonfree-Software" href="/essay_offer.php?article=scrap1_13"><h3>13. Categories of Free and Nonfree Software</h3></a><div class="teasers_item"><p>Free software is software that comes with permission for anyone to use, copy, and/or distribute, either verbatim or with modifications, either gratis or for a fee. In particular, this means that source code must be available. “If it’s not source, it’s not software.”</p></div></li>
<li><a name="stoc-Why-Open-Source-Misses-the-Point-of-Free-Software" href="/essay_offer.php?article=scrap1_14"><h3>14. Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software</h3></a><div class="teasers_item"><p>When we call software “free,” we mean that it respects the users’ essential freedoms: the freedom to run it, to study and change it, and to redistribute copies with or without changes. This is a matter of freedom, not price, so think of “free speech,” not “free beer.” </p></div></li>
- <li><a name="stoc-Did-You-Say-_0060_0060Intellectual-Property_0027_0027_003f_0040entrybreak_007b_007dIt_0027s-a-Seductive-Mirage" href="/essay_offer.php?article=scrap1_15"><h3>15. Did You Say “Intellectual Property”?@entrybreak{}It’s a Seductive Mirage</h3></a><div class="teasers_item"><p></p></div></li>
+ <li><a name="stoc-Did-You-Say-_0060_0060Intellectual-Property_0027_0027_003f_0040entrybreak_007b_007dIt_0027s-a-Seductive-Mirage" href="/essay_offer.php?article=scrap1_15"><h3>15. Did You Say “Intellectual Property”? It’s a Seductive Mirage</h3></a><div class="teasers_item"><p></p></div></li>
<li><a name="stoc-Words-to-Avoid-_0028or-Use-with-Care_0029--Because-They-Are-Loaded-or-Confusing" href="/essay_offer.php?article=scrap1_16"><h3>16. Words to Avoid (or Use with Care) <br>Because They Are Loaded or Confusing</h3></a><div class="teasers_item"><p>There are a number of words and phrases that we recommend avoiding, or avoiding in certain contexts and usages. Some are ambiguous or misleading; others presuppose a viewpoint that we hope you disagree with. </p></div></li>
<li><a name="stoc-The-Right-to-Read_003a-A-Dystopian-Short-Story" href="/essay_offer.php?article=scrap1_17"><h3>17. The Right to Read: A Dystopian Short Story</h3></a><div class="teasers_item"><p>For Dan Halbert, the road to Tycho began in college—when Lissa Lenz asked to borrow his computer. Hers had broken down, and unless she could borrow another, she would fail her midterm project. There was no one she dared ask, except Dan. </p></div></li>
<li><a name="stoc-Misinterpreting-Copyright_002d_002d_002dA-Series-of-Errors" href="/essay_offer.php?article=scrap1_18"><h3>18. Misinterpreting Copyright—A Series of Errors</h3></a><div class="teasers_item"><p>Something strange and dangerous is happening in copyright law. Under the US Constitution, copyright exists to benefit users—those who read books, listen to music, watch movies, or run software—not for the sake of publishers or authors. Yet even as people tend increasingly to reject and disobey the copyright restrictions imposed on them “for their own benefit,” the US government is adding more restrictions, and trying to frighten the public into obedience with harsh new penalties.</p></div></li>
