commit e51d59202aa7d8e3afcd57d7a2bc977816d0a166
parent dae19b40e96bcbbf1d532ad7c0a889c6c0c38c4a
Author: Jonathan <ondesmartenot@riseup.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:51:40 +0800
1.1: small edits
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/intro.tex b/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/intro.tex
@@ -101,16 +101,15 @@ on a commission basis. For-profit fund
raising agencies often engage in privacy-invasive practices to identify and contact potential donors.
One common scenario is that after a first donation, such bad actors % calling them "bad actors" might be unnecessarily opinionated. From a privacy perspective they are not good, but many organizations also rely on these services to not go bankrupt. -JL
start to aggressively pressure a particular donor for more --- with personalized
-emails, letters, phone calls and even in person visits.
+emails, letters, phone calls and even in-person visits.
Donor information may also be shared between organizations,
leading to an avalanche of donation requests from organizations that the donor might not be interested in supporting.
-In the era of data driven donations and corporate social media
+In the era of data-driven donations and corporate social media
surveillance, this kind of behavior has unfortunately become so easy
-that there are not just pro bono but even paid services (source in the
-Netherlands:
+that there are not just pro bono but even paid services (e.g.,
\href{https://www.donateursbelangen.nl/opzegservice}{Stichting
- Donateursbelangen}) to de-register and exercise the ``right to be
+ Donateursbelangen} in the Netherlands) to de-register and exercise the ``right to be
forgotten'' after donating.
These concerns suggest that a privacy-preserving donation system
