summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/examples/blog/articles/scrap1_40.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'examples/blog/articles/scrap1_40.html')
-rw-r--r--examples/blog/articles/scrap1_40.html193
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 193 deletions
diff --git a/examples/blog/articles/scrap1_40.html b/examples/blog/articles/scrap1_40.html
deleted file mode 100644
index fc5d68e6..00000000
--- a/examples/blog/articles/scrap1_40.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,193 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/loose.dtd">
-<html><!-- This is the second edition of Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman.
-
-Free Software Foundation
-
-51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
-
-Boston, MA 02110-1335
-Copyright C 2002, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire book are permitted
-worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this notice is
-preserved. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations
-of this book from the original English into another language provided
-the translation has been approved by the Free Software Foundation and
-the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all
-copies.
-
-ISBN 978-0-9831592-0-9
-Cover design by Rob Myers.
-
-Cover photograph by Peter Hinely.
- --><!-- Created on February 18, 2016 by texi2html 1.82
-texi2html was written by:
- Lionel Cons <Lionel.Cons@cern.ch> (original author)
- Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>
- Olaf Bachmann <obachman@mathematik.uni-kl.de>
- and many others.
-Maintained by: Many creative people.
-Send bugs and suggestions to <texi2html-bug@nongnu.org>
---><head><title>Free Software, Free Society, 2nd ed.: 40. Computing “Progress”: Good and Bad</title><meta name="description" content="This is the second edition of Richard Stallman's collection of essays."><meta name="keywords" content="Free Software, Free Society, 2nd ed.: 40. Computing “Progress”: Good and Bad"><meta name="resource-type" content="document"><meta name="distribution" content="global"><meta name="Generator" content="texi2html 1.82"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><style type="text/css">
-<!--
-a.summary-letter {text-decoration: none}
-blockquote.smallquotation {font-size: smaller}
-pre.display {font-family: serif}
-pre.format {font-family: serif}
-pre.menu-comment {font-family: serif}
-pre.menu-preformatted {font-family: serif}
-pre.smalldisplay {font-family: serif; font-size: smaller}
-pre.smallexample {font-size: smaller}
-pre.smallformat {font-family: serif; font-size: smaller}
-pre.smalllisp {font-size: smaller}
-span.roman {font-family:serif; font-weight:normal;}
-span.sansserif {font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:normal;}
-ul.toc {list-style: none}
--->
-</style><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../web-common/style.css"></head><body lang="en" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#0000FF" vlink="#800080" alink="#FF0000" class="article">
-
-<a name="Computing-Progress"></a>
-<header><div id="logo"><a href="/"><img src="../gnu.svg" height="100" width="100"></a></div><h1 class="book-title">Free Software, Free Society, 2nd ed.</h1></header><section id="main"><a name="Computing-_0060_0060Progress_0027_0027_003a-Good-and-Bad"></a>
-<h1 class="chapter"> 40. Computing “Progress”: Good and Bad </h1>
-
-<a name="index-Horowitz_002c-Bradley"></a>
-<a name="index-UK"></a>
-<a name="index-Big-Brother"></a>
-<a name="index-New-Labour"></a>
-<a name="index-China"></a>
-<a name="index-Yahoo"></a>
-<a name="index-proprietary-software_002c-spying-on-users-2"></a>
-<p>Bradley Horowitz of
-Yahoo proposed here<a name="DOCF50" href="#FOOT50">(50)</a> that every object in
-our world have a unique number so that your cell phone could record
-everything you do—even which cans you picked up while in the
-supermarket.
-</p>
-<p>If the phone is like today’s phones, it will use proprietary software:
-software controlled by the companies that developed it, not by its
-users. Those companies will ensure that your phone makes the
-information it collects about you available to the phone company’s
-database (let’s call it Big Brother) and probably to other
-companies.
-</p>
-<p>In the UK of the future, as New Labour would have it, those companies
-will surely turn this information over to the police. If your phone
-reports you bought a wooden stick and a piece of poster board, the
-phone company’s system will deduce that you may be planning a protest,
-and report you automatically to the police so they can accuse you of
-“terrorism.”
-</p>
-<p>In the UK, it is literally an offense to be suspect—more precisely,
-to possess any object in circumstances that create a “reasonable
-suspicion” that you might use it in certain criminal ways. Your
-phone will give the police plenty of opportunities to suspect you so
-they can charge you with having been suspected by them. Similar
-things will happen in China, where Yahoo has already given the
-government all the information it needed to imprison a dissident; it
-subsequently asked for our understanding on the excuse that it was
-“just following orders.”
-</p>
-<a name="index-cell-phones-_0028see-also-both-OpenMoko-and-Apple_0029-1"></a>
-<p>Horowitz would like cell phones to tag information automatically,
-based on knowing when you participate in an event or meeting. That
-means the phone company will also know precisely whom you meet. That
-information will also be interesting to governments, such as those of
-the UK and China, that cut corners on human rights.
-</p>
-<p>I do not much like Horowitz’s vision of total surveillance. Rather, I
-envision a world in which our computers never collect, or release, any
-information about us except when we want them to.
-</p>
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-call-it-_0060_0060Digital-Restrictions-Management_0027_0027-6"></a>
-<p>Nonfree software does other nasty things besides spying; it often
-implements digital handcuffs—features designed to restrict the users
-(also called DRM, for Digital Restrictions Management). These features
-control how you can access, copy, or move the files in your own
-computer.
-</p>
-<p>DRM is a common practice:
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-and-Microsoft"></a>
-Microsoft does it,
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-and-Apple"></a>
-Apple does it,
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-and-Google"></a>
-Google
-does it, even the
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-and-BBC-iPlayer"></a>
-<a name="index-iPlayer_002c-BBC-_0028see-also-DRM_0029"></a>
-BBC’s iPlayer does it. Many governments, taking the
-side of these companies against the public, have made it illegal to
-tell others how to escape from the digital handcuffs. As a result,
-competition does nothing to check the practice: no matter how many
-proprietary alternatives you might have to choose from, they will all
-handcuff you just the same. If the computer knows where you are
-located, it can make DRM even worse: there are companies that would
-like to restrict what you can access based on your present location.
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-call-it-_0060_0060Digital-Restrictions-Management_0027_0027-7"></a>
-</p>
-<p>My vision of the world is different. I would like to see a world in
-which all the software in our computers — in our desktop PCs, our
-laptops, our handhelds, our phones — is under our control and
-respects our freedom. In other words, a world where all software is
-<em>free</em> software.
-</p>
-<p>Free software, freedom-respecting software, means that every user of
-the program is free to get the program’s source code and change the
-program to do what she wants, and also free to give away or sell
-copies, either exact or modified. This means the users are in
-control. With the users in control of the software, nobody has power
-to impose nasty features on others.
-</p>
-<p>Even if you don’t exercise this control yourself, you are part of a
-society where others do. If you are not a programmer, other users of
-the program are. They will probably find and remove any nasty
-features, which might spy on or restrict you, and publish safe
-versions. You will have only to elect to use them—and since
-all other users will prefer them, that will usually happen with no
-effort on your part.
-</p>
-<a name="index-Stross_002c-Charles"></a>
-<p>Charles Stross envisioned computers that permanently record everything
-that we see and hear.<a name="DOCF51" href="#FOOT51">(51)</a> Those records could be very useful, as long as
-Big Brother doesn’t see and hear all of them. Today’s cell phones are
-already capable of listening to their users without informing them, at
-the request of the police, the phone company, or anyone that knows the
-requisite commands. As long as phones use nonfree software,
-controlled by its developers and not by the users, we must expect this
-to get worse. Only free software enables computer-using citizens to
-resist totalitarian surveillance.
-<a name="index-cell-phones-_0028see-also-both-OpenMoko-and-Apple_0029-2"></a>
-</p>
-<a name="index-Winer_002c-Dave"></a>
-<p>Dave Winer’s article<a name="DOCF52" href="#FOOT52">(52)</a> suggested that Mr.
-<a name="index-Gates_002c-Bill"></a>
-Gates should send a copy of
-<a name="index-Windows_002c-Vista-2"></a>
-<a name="index-Vista_002c-Windows-_0028see-also-both-Windows-and-DRM_0029-3"></a>
-Windows Vista to
-<a name="index-Alpha-Centauri"></a>
-Alpha Centauri. I understand the feeling, but
-sending just one won’t solve our problem here on Earth. Windows is
-designed to spy on users and restrict them. We should collect all the
-copies of
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-and-Windows"></a>
-Windows, and of
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-and-MacOS"></a>
-<a name="index-MacOS-_0028see-also-DRM_0029-1"></a>
-MacOS and
-<a name="index-DRM_002c-and-BBC-iPlayer-1"></a>
-<a name="index-iPlayer_002c-BBC-_0028see-also-DRM_0029-1"></a>
-iPlayer for the same reason, and send
-them to Alpha Centauri at the slowest possible speed. Or just erase
-them.
-<a name="index-Big-Brother-1"></a>
-<a name="index-proprietary-software_002c-spying-on-users-3"></a>
-</p><div class="footnote">
-<hr><h3>Footnotes</h3>
-<h3><a name="FOOT50" href="#DOCF50">(50)</a></h3>
-<p>Bradley Horowitz, “The Tech Lab: Bradley Horowitz,” <cite>BBC News,</cite> 29 June 2007, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6252716.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6252716.stm</a>.
-</p><h3><a name="FOOT51" href="#DOCF51">(51)</a></h3>
-<p>Charles Stross, “The Tech Lab: Charles Stross,” <cite>BBC News,</cite> 10 July 2007, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6287126.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6287126.stm</a>.
-</p><h3><a name="FOOT52" href="#DOCF52">(52)</a></h3>
-<p>Dave Winer, “The Tech Lab: Dave Winer,” <cite>BBC News,</cite> 14 June 2007, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6748103.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6748103.stm</a>.
-</p></div>
-<hr size="2"></section></body></html>