summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/examples/blog/articles/scrap1_39.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'examples/blog/articles/scrap1_39.html')
-rw-r--r--examples/blog/articles/scrap1_39.html153
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 153 deletions
diff --git a/examples/blog/articles/scrap1_39.html b/examples/blog/articles/scrap1_39.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 09abea77..00000000
--- a/examples/blog/articles/scrap1_39.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,153 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/loose.dtd">
-<html><!-- This is the second edition of Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman.
-
-Free Software Foundation
-
-51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
-
-Boston, MA 02110-1335
-Copyright C 2002, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
-Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire book are permitted
-worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this notice is
-preserved. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations
-of this book from the original English into another language provided
-the translation has been approved by the Free Software Foundation and
-the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all
-copies.
-
-ISBN 978-0-9831592-0-9
-Cover design by Rob Myers.
-
-Cover photograph by Peter Hinely.
- --><!-- Created on February 18, 2016 by texi2html 1.82
-texi2html was written by:
- Lionel Cons <Lionel.Cons@cern.ch> (original author)
- Karl Berry <karl@freefriends.org>
- Olaf Bachmann <obachman@mathematik.uni-kl.de>
- and many others.
-Maintained by: Many creative people.
-Send bugs and suggestions to <texi2html-bug@nongnu.org>
---><head><title>Free Software, Free Society, 2nd ed.: 39. Thank You, Larry McVoy</title><meta name="description" content="This is the second edition of Richard Stallman's collection of essays."><meta name="keywords" content="Free Software, Free Society, 2nd ed.: 39. Thank You, Larry McVoy"><meta name="resource-type" content="document"><meta name="distribution" content="global"><meta name="Generator" content="texi2html 1.82"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><style type="text/css">
-<!--
-a.summary-letter {text-decoration: none}
-blockquote.smallquotation {font-size: smaller}
-pre.display {font-family: serif}
-pre.format {font-family: serif}
-pre.menu-comment {font-family: serif}
-pre.menu-preformatted {font-family: serif}
-pre.smalldisplay {font-family: serif; font-size: smaller}
-pre.smallexample {font-size: smaller}
-pre.smallformat {font-family: serif; font-size: smaller}
-pre.smalllisp {font-size: smaller}
-span.roman {font-family:serif; font-weight:normal;}
-span.sansserif {font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:normal;}
-ul.toc {list-style: none}
--->
-</style><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../web-common/style.css"></head><body lang="en" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#0000FF" vlink="#800080" alink="#FF0000" class="article">
-
-<a name="McVoy"></a>
-<header><div id="logo"><a href="/"><img src="../gnu.svg" height="100" width="100"></a></div><h1 class="book-title">Free Software, Free Society, 2nd ed.</h1></header><section id="main"><a name="Thank-You_002c-Larry-McVoy"></a>
-<h1 class="chapter"> 39. Thank You, Larry McVoy </h1>
-
-<a name="index-McVoy_002c-Larry"></a>
-<a name="index-nonfree-software_002c-danger-of"></a>
-<p>For the first time in my life, I want to thank Larry McVoy. He
-recently eliminated a major weakness of the free software community,
-by announcing the end of his campaign to entice free software projects
-to use and promote his nonfree software. Soon, Linux development
-will no longer use this program, and no longer spread the message that
-nonfree software is a good thing if it’s convenient.
-</p>
-<p>My gratitude is limited, since it was McVoy that created the problem
-in the first place. But I still appreciate his decision to clear it
-up.
-</p>
-<a name="index-BitKeeper"></a>
-<p>There are thousands of nonfree programs, and most merit no special
-attention, other than developing a free replacement. What made this
-program, BitKeeper, infamous and dangerous was its marketing approach:
-inviting high-profile free software projects to use it, so as to
-attract other paying users.
-</p>
-<p>McVoy made the program available gratis to free software developers.
-This did not mean it was free software for them: they were privileged
-not to part with their money, but they still had to part with their
-freedom. They gave up the fundamental freedoms that define free
-software: freedom to run the program as you wish for any purpose,
-freedom to study and change the source code as you wish, freedom to
-make and redistribute copies, and freedom to publish modified
-versions.
-</p>
-<p>The free software movement has said, “Think of ‘free speech,’ not
-‘free beer’” since 1990. McVoy said the opposite; he invited
-developers to focus on the lack of monetary price, instead of on
-freedom. A free software activist would dismiss this suggestion, but
-those in our community who value technical advantage above freedom and
-community were susceptible to it.
-</p>
-<a name="index-Linux-kernel-5"></a>
-<a name="index-kernel_002c-Linux-5"></a>
-<p>McVoy’s great triumph was the adoption of this program for Linux
-development. No free software project is more visible than Linux. It
-is the kernel of the GNU/Linux operating system, an essential
-component, and users often mistake it for the entire system. As McVoy
-surely planned, the use of his program in Linux development was
-powerful publicity for it.
-</p>
-<p>It was also, whether intentionally or not, a powerful political PR
-campaign, telling the free software community that freedom-denying
-software is acceptable as long as it’s convenient. If we had taken
-that attitude towards Unix in 1984, where would we be today? Nowhere.
-If we had accepted using Unix, instead of setting out to replace it,
-nothing like the GNU/Linux system would exist.
-</p>
-<p>Of course, the Linux developers had practical reasons for what they
-did. I won’t argue with those reasons; they surely know what’s
-convenient for them. But they did not count, or did not value, how
-this would affect their freedom—or the rest of the community’s
-efforts.
-</p>
-<p>A free kernel, even a whole free operating system, is not sufficient
-to use your computer in freedom; we need free software for everything
-else, too. Free applications, free drivers, free BIOS: some of those
-projects face large obstacles—the need to reverse engineer
-formats or protocols or pressure companies to document them, or to
-work around or face down patent threats, or to compete with a network
-effect. Success will require firmness and determination. A better
-kernel is desirable, to be sure, but not at the expense of weakening
-the impetus to liberate the rest of the software world.
-<a name="index-Linux-kernel-6"></a>
-<a name="index-kernel_002c-Linux-6"></a>
-</p>
-<p>When the use of his program became controversial, McVoy responded with
-distraction. For instance, he promised to release it as free software
-if the company went out of business. Alas, that does no good as long
-as the company remains in business. Linux developers responded by
-saying, “We’ll switch to a free program when you develop a
-better one.” This was an indirect way of saying, “We made
-the mess, but we won’t clean it up.”
-</p>
-<p>Fortunately, not everyone in Linux development considered a nonfree
-program acceptable, and there was continuing pressure for a free
-alternative. Finally
-<a name="index-Tridgell_002c-Andrew"></a>
-Andrew Tridgell developed an interoperating free
-program, so Linux developers would no longer need to use a nonfree
-program.
-</p>
-<p>McVoy first blustered and threatened, but ultimately chose to go home
-and take his ball with him: he withdrew permission for gratis use by
-free software projects, and Linux developers will move to other
-software. The program they no longer use will remain unethical as
-long as it is nonfree, but they will no longer promote it, nor by
-using it teach others to give freedom low priority. We can begin to
-forget about that program.
-</p>
-<a name="index-call-to-action_002c-beware-of-nonfree-programs"></a>
-<p>We should not forget the lesson we have learned from it: Nonfree
-programs are dangerous to you and to your community. Don’t let them
-get a place in your life.
-<a name="index-McVoy_002c-Larry-1"></a>
-<a name="index-nonfree-software_002c-danger-of-1"></a>
-</p>
-</section></body></html>