diff options
| author | Jeffrey Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org> | 2017-05-18 14:35:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jeffrey Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org> | 2017-05-18 14:40:41 +0200 |
| commit | 4637a1ea6b0386f92901a13fa5844a78fdfc941a (patch) | |
| tree | 7ffb4a0b197e33d32eae6f6f4ef8d1640da0e0a6 | |
| parent | c47745a1b3aab470035b1883b08e4f6e7131038f (diff) | |
| download | exchange-4637a1ea6b0386f92901a13fa5844a78fdfc941a.tar.gz exchange-4637a1ea6b0386f92901a13fa5844a78fdfc941a.tar.bz2 exchange-4637a1ea6b0386f92901a13fa5844a78fdfc941a.zip | |
Do we really need to mention post-quantum RSA? lol
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt | 5 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt b/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt index 60a7c0da4..80e590c38 100644 --- a/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt +++ b/doc/paper/taler_FC2016.txt @@ -298,9 +298,8 @@ importance or even existence. > scheme still seems to offer the best security/performance trade-off, > and we also value simplicity and extensive peer-review of the > cryptographic primitives used for production systems. So far, none -> of the schemes compete. For example, Bernstein recently proposed an -> interesting PostQuantum blind-signature scheme, but the keys are too -> large to be useful in practice. +> of the schemes compete. In particular, the elliptic curve blind +> signatures mostly require extra round trips. However, providing proofs of the statement to be signed is important, and a potential attack on the presented scheme may illustrate this. The |