taler-merchant-demos

surveillance-testimony.html (5765B)

---

 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
 <!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
 <!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays cultural evils" -->
 <!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
 <title>Surveillance Testimony - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
  <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/surveillance-testimony.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
 <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
 <div class="article reduced-width">
 <h2>Surveillance Testimony</h2>
 
 <div class="infobox">
 <p>Richard Stallman's statement to the Cambridge City Council, Jan 22, 2018,
 about the proposed Cambridge surveillance ordinance.</p>
 </div>
 <hr class="thin" />
 
 <p><strong>Mayor McGovern:</strong> Thank you. Richard Stallman followed by Elaine DeRosa.</p>
 
 <p><strong>RMS:</strong> I'm here to speak about the proposed surveillance ordinance.
 I've got a copy of what I printed out, and I have some suggestions.</p>
 
 <p>First of all there's a Definition of &ldquo;surveillance&rdquo; which I think is
 too narrow. In addition to &ldquo;movements, behavior and actions,&rdquo; it
 should include communications.</p>
 
 <p>Furthermore, instead of just saying &ldquo;in a matter that is reasonably
 likely to raise concerns,&rdquo; any recording of what is observed should be
 assumed to raise civil liberties concerns.</p>
 
 <p>There's also a definition of &ldquo;surveillance technology,&rdquo; which I think is
 far too limited.</p>
 
 <p>I suggest that any physical device or system including computers running
 software that has surveillance capability is surveillance technology.
 Any technology that can do surveillance is surveillance technology.</p>
 
 <p>The definition of &ldquo;surveillance capability&rdquo; I think is pretty good.</p>
 
 <p>In addition, when it comes to what to do about surveillance
 technology, the Emergency Permission seems far too loose. It would be
 easy to interpret this such that one could decide there's nowadays
 some sort of threat, and there always will be [that threat], so
 surveillance is permitted on an emergency basis forever.</p>
 
 <p>Well, that's the kind of false emergency that we shouldn't accept.
 This requirement should be specific and clear enough that that can't
 pass under it.</p>
 
 <p>I suggest treating it like a wiretap or searching people's houses.</p>
 
 <p>Now there are times when it's possible to search someone's house
 urgently. That's permitted. But in general you have to get a court
 order [to do a search].</p>
 
 <p>And I think that same requirement should apply to any kind of surveillance
 that hasn't gone through the regular process.</p>
 
 <p>[Item] number 9 talks about &ldquo;persons injured in violation of the Ordinance,&rdquo;
 but I don't think there's a definition of what it means to be injured.</p>
 
 <p>I'd like to suggest that to be surveilled is to be injured.</p>
 
 <p>Thank you.</p>
 </div>
 
 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
 <div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
 <div class="unprintable">
 
 <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
 <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
 There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
 the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
 to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
 
 <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
         replace it with the translation of these two:
 
         We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
         translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
         Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
         to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
 
         <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
         our web pages, see <a
         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
         README</a>. -->
 Please see the <a
 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
 README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations
 of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
      be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
      document was modified, or published.
      
      If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
      Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
      years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
      year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
      being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
      
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
 <p>Copyright &copy; 2018, 2021 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
 Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
 $Date: 2021/10/01 10:55:57 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
 </div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
 </body>
 </html>