taler-merchant-demos

Python-based Frontends for the Demonstration Web site
Log | Files | Refs | Submodules | README | LICENSE

push-copyright-aside.html (10377B)


      1 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
      2 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
      3 <!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
      4 <!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays laws copyright" -->
      5 <!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
      6 <title>Science Must Push Copyright Aside
      7 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
      8 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/push-copyright-aside.translist" -->
      9 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
     10 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
     11 <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
     12 <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
     13 <div class="article reduced-width">
     14 <h2>Science Must Push Copyright Aside</h2>
     15 
     16 <address class="byline">by Richard Stallman</address>
     17 
     18 <div class="introduction">
     19 <p><em>Many points that lead to a conclusion that software freedom must be
     20 universal often apply to other forms of expressive works, albeit in
     21 different ways. This essay concerns the application of principles
     22 related to software freedom to the area of literature.
     23 Generally, such issues are orthogonal to software freedom, but we
     24 include essays like this here since many people interested in Free
     25 Software want to know more about how the principles can be applied to
     26 areas other than software.</em></p>
     27 </div>
     28 
     29 <p>It should be a truism that the scientific literature exists to
     30 disseminate scientific knowledge, and that scientific journals exist
     31 to facilitate the process.  It therefore follows that rules for use of
     32 the scientific literature should be designed to help achieve that
     33 goal.</p>
     34 
     35 <p>The rules we have now, known as copyright, were established in the
     36 age of the printing press, an inherently centralized method of
     37 mass-production copying.  In a print environment, copyright on journal
     38 articles restricted only journal publishers&mdash;requiring them to
     39 obtain permission to publish an article&mdash;and would-be
     40 plagiarists. It helped journals to operate and disseminate knowledge,
     41 without interfering with the useful work of scientists or students,
     42 either as writers or readers of articles. These rules fit that system
     43 well.</p>
     44 
     45 <p>The modern technology for scientific publishing, however, is the
     46 World Wide Web.  What rules would best ensure the maximum
     47 dissemination of scientific articles, and knowledge, on the web?
     48 Articles should be distributed in nonproprietary formats, with open
     49 access for all. And everyone should have the right to
     50 &ldquo;mirror&rdquo; articles&mdash;that is, to republish them verbatim
     51 with proper attribution.</p>
     52 
     53 <p>These rules should apply to past as well as future articles, when
     54 they are distributed in electronic form. But there is no crucial need
     55 to change the present copyright system as it applies to paper
     56 publication of journals because the problem is not in that domain.</p>
     57 
     58 <p>Unfortunately, it seems that not everyone agrees with the truisms
     59 that began this article. Many journal publishers appear to believe
     60 that the purpose of scientific literature is to enable them to publish
     61 journals so as to collect subscriptions from scientists and
     62 students. Such thinking is known as &ldquo;confusion of the means with
     63 the ends.&rdquo;</p>
     64 
     65 <p>Their approach has been to restrict access even to read the
     66 scientific literature to those who can and will pay for it. They use
     67 copyright law, which is still in force despite its inappropriateness
     68 for computer networks, as an excuse to stop scientists from choosing
     69 new rules.</p>
     70 
     71 <p>For the sake of scientific cooperation and humanity's future, we
     72 must reject that approach at its root&mdash;not merely the
     73 obstructive systems that have been instituted, but the mistaken
     74 priorities that inspired them.</p>
     75 
     76 <p>Journal publishers sometimes claim that online access requires
     77 expensive high-powered server machines, and that they must charge
     78 access fees to pay for these servers. This &ldquo;problem&rdquo; is a
     79 consequence of its own &ldquo;solution.&rdquo; Give everyone the
     80 freedom to mirror, and libraries around the world will set up mirror
     81 sites to meet the demand. This decentralized solution will reduce
     82 network bandwidth needs and provide faster access, all the while
     83 protecting the scholarly record against accidental loss.</p>
     84 
     85 <p>Publishers also argue that paying the editors requires charging for
     86 access.  Let us accept the assumption that editors must be paid; this
     87 tail need not wag the dog. The cost of editing for a typical paper is
     88 between 1 percent and 3 percent of the cost of funding the research to produce
     89 it. Such a small percentage of the cost can hardly justify obstructing
     90 the use of the results.</p>
     91 
     92 <p>Instead, the cost of editing could be recovered, for example,
     93 through page charges to the authors, who can pass these on to the
     94 research sponsors.  The sponsors should not mind, given that they
     95 currently pay for publication in a more cumbersome way, through
     96 overhead fees for the university library's subscription to the
     97 journal. By changing the economic model to charge editing costs to the
     98 research sponsors, we can eliminate the apparent need to restrict
     99 access. The occasional author who is not affiliated with an
    100 institution or company, and who has no research sponsor, could be
    101 exempted from page charges, with costs levied on institution-based
    102 authors.</p>
    103 
    104 <p>Another justification for access fees to online publications is to
    105 fund conversion of the print archives of a journal into online
    106 form. That work needs to be done, but we should seek alternative ways
    107 of funding it that do not involve obstructing access to the
    108 result. The work itself will not be any more difficult, or cost any
    109 more. It is self-defeating to digitize the archives and waste the
    110 results by restricting access.</p>
    111 
    112 <p>The US Constitution says that copyright exists &ldquo;to promote
    113 the Progress of Science.&rdquo; When copyright impedes the progress of
    114 science, science must push copyright out of the way.</p>
    115 
    116 <hr class="column-limit" />
    117 
    118 <h3 class="footnote">Later developments</h3>
    119 
    120 <p>Some universities have adopted policies to thwart the journal
    121 publishers' power. For instance, look at the
    122 <a href="https://libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-policy/">
    123 MIT Faculty Open Access Policy</a>.
    124 Stronger policies are needed, however, as this one permits individual
    125 authors to &ldquo;opt out&rdquo; (i.e., cave in).</p>
    126 
    127 <p>The US government has imposed a requirement known as &ldquo;public
    128 access&rdquo; on some funded research.  This requires publication within a
    129 certain period in a site that allows anyone to view the article.  This
    130 requirement is a positive step, but inadequate because it does not
    131 include freedom to redistribute the article.</p>
    132 
    133 <p>Curiously, the concept of &ldquo;open access&rdquo; in the 2002 Budapest Open
    134 Access Initiative did include freedom to redistribute.  I signed that
    135 declaration, despite my distaste for the word &ldquo;open,&rdquo; because the
    136 substance of the position was right.</p>
    137 
    138 <p>However, the word &ldquo;open&rdquo; had the last laugh: influential
    139 campaigners for &ldquo;open access&rdquo; subsequently dropped freedom to
    140 redistribute from their goals.  I stand by the position of
    141 the <a href="https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/">BOAI</a>, but now that
    142 &ldquo;open access&rdquo; means something else, I refer to it as &ldquo;redistributable
    143 publication&rdquo; or &ldquo;free-to-mirror publication.&rdquo;</p>
    144 
    145 <div class="infobox extra" role="complementary">
    146 <hr />
    147 <p>This article appeared in <a
    148 href="https://web.archive.org/web/20050729110347/http://www.nature.com/nature/debates/e-access/Articles/stallman.html">
    149 <cite>Nature WebDebates</cite></a> in 2001.</p>
    150 </div>
    151 </div>
    152 
    153 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
    154 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
    155 <div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
    156 <div class="unprintable">
    157 
    158 <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
    159 <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
    160 There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
    161 the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
    162 to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
    163 
    164 <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
    165         replace it with the translation of these two:
    166 
    167         We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
    168         translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
    169         Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
    170         to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
    171         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
    172 
    173         <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
    174         our web pages, see <a
    175         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
    176         README</a>. -->
    177 Please see the <a
    178 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
    179 README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations
    180 of this article.</p>
    181 </div>
    182 
    183 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
    184      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
    185      be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
    186      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
    187      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
    188      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
    189      document was modified, or published.
    190      
    191      If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
    192      Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
    193      years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
    194      year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
    195      being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
    196      
    197      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
    198      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
    199 
    200 <p>Copyright &copy; 2001, 2010-2012, 2021 Richard Stallman</p>
    201 
    202 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
    203 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
    204 Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
    205 
    206 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
    207 
    208 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
    209 <!-- timestamp start -->
    210 $Date: 2021/10/02 11:25:45 $
    211 <!-- timestamp end -->
    212 </p>
    213 </div>
    214 </div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
    215 </body>
    216 </html>