taler-merchant-demos

Python-based Frontends for the Demonstration Web site
Log | Files | Refs | Submodules | README | LICENSE

microsoft.html (8259B)


      1 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
      2 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
      3 <!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
      4 <!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays cultural evils" -->
      5 <!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
      6 <title>Is Microsoft the Great Satan?
      7 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
      8 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft.translist" -->
      9 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
     10 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
     11 <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
     12 <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
     13 <div class="article reduced-width">
     14 <h2>Is Microsoft the Great Satan?</h2>
     15 
     16 <div class="infobox">
     17 <p><em>This article was given a major rewrite in 2009.
     18 The <a href="/philosophy/microsoft-old.html">old version</a> is also
     19 available.</em></p>
     20 </div>
     21 <hr class="thin" />
     22 
     23 <p>Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the
     24 software industry.  There is even a specific campaign to boycott
     25 Microsoft.  This feeling has intensified since Microsoft expressed
     26 active hostility towards free software.</p>
     27 
     28 <p>In the free software movement, our perspective is different.  We
     29 see that Microsoft is doing something that mistreats software users:
     30 making software <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">
     31 proprietary</a> and thus denying users their rightful freedom.  But
     32 Microsoft is not alone in this; many other companies do the same thing
     33 to the users.  If other companies manage to dominate fewer users than
     34 Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.</p>
     35 
     36 <p>This is not meant to excuse Microsoft.  Rather, it is meant as a
     37 reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software
     38 industry based on <a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">keeping
     39 users divided and subjugating them</a>.  When criticizing Microsoft,
     40 we should not focus so narrowly on Microsoft that we let other
     41 proprietary software developers off the hook.</p>
     42 
     43 <p>When we reject Microsoft's proprietary software, that is not a
     44 boycott.  The word &ldquo;boycott&rdquo; means rejection, as a
     45 protest, of products that are otherwise acceptable.  Rejecting a
     46 product because it hurts you is not a boycott, just ordinary
     47 rationality.  To maintain your freedom, you need to
     48 reject the software that takes away freedom, regardless of who developed
     49 it or who distributes it.</p>
     50 
     51 <p>There is no need to reject Microsoft non-software products, or
     52 services that you can use without proprietary software.  (When you use
     53 a web service, whether Microsoft's or not, watch out for
     54 <a href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">nonfree JavaScript
     55 programs</a> that it may try to slip into your browser.)  When
     56 Microsoft releases free programs, which it occasionally does, they are
     57 acceptable in theory.  Alas, most of them depend fundamentally on
     58 Microsoft proprietary software, which we do need to reject, and that
     59 makes them useless for anyone that chooses to live in freedom.</p>
     60 
     61 <p>In the &ldquo;Halloween documents,&rdquo; leaked in October 1998,
     62 Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various methods to
     63 obstruct the development of free software: specifically, designing
     64 secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms and
     65 software features.</p>
     66 
     67 <p>These obstructionist policies were not new: Microsoft, and many
     68 other software companies, had been doing them for years.  Secrecy
     69 and patents have obstructed us greatly, and they may be more damaging
     70 in the future.  For the most part, the companies' main motivation in
     71 doing these things is to attack each other; now, it seems, we are
     72 specifically targeted.  Microsoft is using its patents directly to
     73 <a href="https://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2009/9/microsoft-and-patent-trolls">
     74 attack the free software community</a>, and our community is fighting
     75 back.</p>
     76 
     77 <p>But Microsoft's patents are not the only patents that threaten us
     78 (and software developers and users generally)&mdash;consider the harm
     79 that the MP3 patents have done.  Thus, defending against specific
     80 attacks is necessary but not sufficient.  The only full solution is
     81 to <a href="https://endsoftwarepatents.org/">eliminate software
     82 patents</a>.
     83 </p>
     84 
     85 <p>Other Microsoft practices specifically harmful to the adoption of
     86 free software are the ones designed to build up social inertia that
     87 obstructs migration to GNU/Linux.  For instance, when Microsoft
     88 &ldquo;donates&rdquo; copies of Windows to schools, it converts these
     89 schools into tools for implanting a dependence on Windows.  There are
     90 indications that Microsoft systematically plans these
     91 activities <a href="http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/EDGI"> as
     92 a campaign against the adoption of GNU/Linux</a>.</p>
     93 
     94 <p>Each Windows &ldquo;upgrade&rdquo; augments Microsoft's power over
     95 the users; Microsoft plans it that way.  And each one is a step
     96 forward in malicious features, which
     97 include <a href="https://www.defectivebydesign.org/">Digital Restrictions
     98 Management</a> and back doors.  So the FSF runs campaigns to warn
     99 users against &ldquo;upgrading&rdquo;
    100 to <a href="http://badvista.fsf.org/">Windows Vista</a>
    101 and <a href="http://windows7sins.org/">Windows 7</a>.  We aim to reduce
    102 the amount of inertia they will create.</p>
    103 
    104 <p>We don't hate Microsoft, and we don't consider it the Great Satan.
    105 But we do recognize it as the company that has separated more users
    106 from their freedom than any other, and a powerful avowed enemy of
    107 computer users' freedom.  We act accordingly.</p>
    108 </div>
    109 
    110 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
    111 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
    112 <div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
    113 <div class="unprintable">
    114 
    115 <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to <a
    116 href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.  There are also <a
    117 href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF.  Broken links and other
    118 corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a
    119 href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
    120 
    121 <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
    122         replace it with the translation of these two:
    123 
    124         We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
    125         translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
    126         Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
    127         to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
    128         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
    129 
    130         <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
    131         our web pages, see <a
    132         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
    133         README</a>. -->
    134 Please see the <a
    135 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for
    136 information on coordinating and contributing translations of this article.</p>
    137 </div>
    138 
    139 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
    140      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
    141      be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
    142      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
    143      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
    144      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
    145      document was modified, or published.
    146      
    147      If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
    148      Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
    149      years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
    150      year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
    151      being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
    152      
    153      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
    154      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
    155 
    156 <p>Copyright &copy; 1997-2000, 2009, 2010, 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
    157 
    158 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
    159 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
    160 Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
    161 
    162 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
    163 
    164 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
    165 <!-- timestamp start -->
    166 $Date: 2021/09/10 10:58:36 $
    167 <!-- timestamp end -->
    168 </p>
    169 </div>
    170 </div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
    171 </body>
    172 </html>