taler-merchant-demos

Python-based Frontends for the Demonstration Web site
Log | Files | Refs | Submodules | README | LICENSE

censoring-emacs.html (7772B)


      1 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
      2 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
      3 <!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
      4 <!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays cultural evils" -->
      5 <!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
      6 <title>Censoring My Software
      7 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
      8 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/censoring-emacs.translist" -->
      9 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
     10 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
     11 <!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
     12 <!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
     13 <div class="article reduced-width">
     14 <h2>Censoring My Software</h2>
     15 
     16 <address class="byline">by <a href="https://www.stallman.org/">Richard
     17 Stallman</a></address>
     18 
     19 <p>
     20 Last summer, a few clever legislators proposed a bill to
     21 &ldquo;prohibit pornography&rdquo; on the Internet. Last fall, the
     22 right-wing Christians made this cause their own. Last week, President
     23 Clinton signed the bill. This week, I'm censoring GNU Emacs.</p>
     24 <p>
     25 No, GNU Emacs does not contain pornography. It's a software package,
     26 an award-winning extensible and programmable text editor. But the law
     27 that was passed applies to far more than pornography. It prohibits
     28 &ldquo;indecent&rdquo; speech, which can include anything from famous
     29 poems, to masterpieces hanging in the Louvre, to advice about safe sex
     30 &hellip; to software.</p>
     31 <p>
     32 Naturally, there was a lot of opposition to this bill. Not only from
     33 people who use the Internet and people who appreciate erotica, but
     34 from everyone who cares about freedom of the press.</p>
     35 <p>
     36 But every time we tried to tell the public what was at stake, the
     37 forces of censorship responded with a lie: They told the public that
     38 the issue was simply pornography. By embedding this lie as a
     39 presupposition in their other statements about the issue, they
     40 succeeded in misinforming the public. So now I am censoring my
     41 software.</p>
     42 <p>
     43 You see, Emacs contains a version of the famous &ldquo;doctor
     44 program,&rdquo; a.k.a. Eliza, originally developed by Professor
     45 Weizenbaum at <abbr title="Massachusetts Institute of
     46 Technology">MIT</abbr>.  This is the program that imitates a Rogerian
     47 psychotherapist. The user talks to the program, and the program
     48 responds&mdash;by playing back the user's own statements, and by
     49 recognizing a long list of particular words.</p>
     50 <p>
     51 The Emacs doctor program was set up to recognize many common curse
     52 words and respond with an appropriately cute message such as,
     53 &ldquo;Would you please watch your tongue?&rdquo; or &ldquo;Let's not
     54 be vulgar.&rdquo; In order to do this, it had to have a list of curse
     55 words. That means the source code for the program was indecent.</p>
     56 <p>
     57 So this week I removed that feature. The new version of the doctor
     58 doesn't recognize the indecent words; if you curse at it, it replays
     59 the curse back to you&mdash;for lack of knowing better. (When the new
     60 version starts up, it announces that it has been censored for your
     61 protection.)</p>
     62 <p>
     63 Now that Americans face the threat of two years in prison for indecent
     64 network postings, it would be helpful if they could access precise
     65 rules for avoiding imprisonment via the Internet. However, this is
     66 impossible. The rules would have to mention the forbidden words, so
     67 posting them on the Internet would violate those same rules.</p>
     68 <p>
     69 Of course, I'm making an assumption about just what
     70 &ldquo;indecent&rdquo; means.  I have to do this, because nobody knows
     71 for sure. The most obvious possible meaning is the meaning it has for
     72 television, so I'm using that as a tentative assumption. However,
     73 there is a good chance that our courts will reject that interpretation
     74 of the law as unconstitutional.</p>
     75 <p>
     76 We can hope that the courts will recognize the Internet as a medium of
     77 publication like books and magazines. If they do, they will entirely
     78 reject any law prohibiting &ldquo;indecent&rdquo; publications on the
     79 Internet.</p>
     80 <p>
     81 What really worries me is that the courts might choose a muddled
     82 half-measure&mdash;by approving an interpretation of
     83 &ldquo;indecent&rdquo; that permits the doctor program or a statement
     84 of the decency rules, but prohibits some of the books that any child
     85 can browse through in the public library. Over the years, as the
     86 Internet replaces the public library, some of our freedom of speech
     87 will be lost.</p>
     88 <p>
     89 Just a few weeks ago, another country imposed censorship on the
     90 Internet. That was China. We don't think well of China in this
     91 country&mdash;its government doesn't respect basic freedoms. But how
     92 well does our government respect them? And do you care enough to
     93 preserve them here?</p>
     94 
     95 <p>
     96 [This paragraph is obsolete:]
     97 </p>
     98 
     99 <p>
    100 If you care, stay in touch with the Voters Telecommunications Watch.
    101 Look in their Web site http://www.vtw.org/ for background information
    102 and political action recommendations. Censorship won in February, but
    103 we can beat it in November.</p>
    104 
    105 <div class="infobox extra" role="complementary">
    106 <hr />
    107 <p>From <cite>Datamation</cite>, March 1 1996</p>
    108 </div>
    109 </div>
    110 
    111 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
    112 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
    113 <div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
    114 <div class="unprintable">
    115 
    116 <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
    117 <a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
    118 There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
    119 the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
    120 to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
    121 
    122 <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
    123         replace it with the translation of these two:
    124 
    125         We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
    126         translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
    127         Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
    128         to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
    129         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
    130 
    131         <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
    132         our web pages, see <a
    133         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
    134         README</a>. -->
    135 Please see the <a
    136 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
    137 README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations
    138 of this article.</p>
    139 </div>
    140 
    141 <!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
    142      files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
    143      be under CC BY-ND 4.0.  Please do NOT change or remove this
    144      without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
    145      Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
    146      document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
    147      document was modified, or published.
    148      
    149      If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
    150      Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
    151      years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
    152      year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
    153      being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
    154      
    155      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
    156      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
    157 
    158 <p>Copyright &copy; 1996, 2021 Richard Stallman</p>
    159 
    160 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
    161 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
    162 Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
    163 
    164 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
    165 
    166 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
    167 <!-- timestamp start -->
    168 $Date: 2021/09/05 07:59:44 $
    169 <!-- timestamp end -->
    170 </p>
    171 </div>
    172 </div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
    173 </body>
    174 </html>