summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/scrap1_12.html
blob: d482bac5d42ee5f54407a4e95f8be6299c18dc64 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
<!-- This is the second edition of Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman.

Free Software Foundation

51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor

Boston, MA 02110-1335
Copyright C 2002, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire book are permitted
worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this notice is
preserved. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations
of this book from the original English into another language provided
the translation has been approved by the Free Software Foundation and
the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all
copies.

ISBN 978-0-9831592-0-9
Cover design by Rob Myers.

Cover photograph by Peter Hinely.
 -->


 <a name="What_0027s-in-a-Name_003f">
 </a>
 <h1 class="chapter">
  12. What’s in a Name?
 </h1>
 <a name="index-nonfree-software_002c-insidious-and-nefarious-addition-of">
 </a>
 <a name="index-terminology_002c-importance-of-using-correct-1">
 </a>
 <a name="index-GNU_002c-GNU-Project-5">
 </a>
 <a name="index-_0060_0060Linux_002c_0027_0027-erroneous-use-of-term-_0028see-also-open-source_0029-1">
 </a>
 <a name="index-GNU_002c-GNU_002fLinux-v_002e-_0060_0060Linux_0027_0027-_0028see-also-both-open-source-and-terminology_0029">
 </a>
 <a name="index-GNU_002fLinux-v_002e-_0060_0060Linux_0027_0027-_0028see-also-both-open-source-and-terminology_0029">
 </a>
 <p>
  Names convey meanings; our choice of names determines the meaning of
what we say. An inappropriate name gives people the wrong idea. A
rose by any other name would smell as sweet—but if you call it a pen,
people will be rather disappointed when they try to write with it.
And if you call pens “roses,” people may not realize what
they are good for. If you call our operating system
Linux, that conveys a mistaken idea of the system’s
origin, history, and purpose. If you call
it GNU/Linux, that conveys (though not in detail) an accurate idea.
 </p>
 <p>
  Does this really matter for our community? Is it important whether people
know the system’s origin, history, and purpose? Yes—because people
who forget history are often condemned to repeat it. The Free World
that has developed around GNU/Linux
is not guaranteed to survive; the problems that
led us to develop GNU are not completely eradicated, and they threaten
to come back.
 </p>
 <p>
  When I explain why it’s appropriate to call the operating system
GNU/Linux rather than Linux, people
sometimes respond this way:
 </p>
 <blockquote class="smallquotation">
  <p>
   Granted that the GNU Project deserves credit for this work, is
  it really worth a fuss when people don’t give credit? Isn’t the
  important thing that the job was done, not who did it? You
  ought to relax, take pride in the job well done, and not worry
  about the credit.
  </p>
 </blockquote>
 <p>
  This would be wise advice, if only the situation were like that—if
the job were done and it were time to relax. If only that were true!
But challenges abound, and this is no time to take the future for
granted. Our community’s strength rests on commitment to freedom and
cooperation. Using the name GNU/Linux is a way for people to remind
themselves and inform others of these goals.
 </p>
 <p>
  It is possible to write good free software without thinking of GNU;
much good work has been done in the name of Linux also. But the term
“Linux” has been associated ever since it was first coined
with a philosophy that does not make a commitment to the freedom to
cooperate. As the name is increasingly used by business, we will
have even more trouble making it connect with community spirit.
 </p>
 <a name="index-developers_002c-proprietary-software-1">
 </a>
 <a name="index-traps_002c-_0060_0060Linux_0027_0027-distribution-companies">
 </a>
 <a name="index-citizen-values_002c-convenience-v_002e-3">
 </a>
 <p>
  A great challenge to the future of free software comes from the
tendency of the “Linux” distribution companies to add
nonfree software to GNU/Linux
in the name of convenience and power. All the major commercial
distribution developers do this; none limits itself to free software.
Most of them do not clearly identify the nonfree
packages in their distributions. Many even develop nonfree software
and add it to the system. Some outrageously advertise
“Linux” systems that are “licensed per seat,”
which give the user as much freedom as Microsoft
  <a name="index-Windows">
  </a>
  Windows.
 </p>
 <p>
  People try to justify adding nonfree software in the name of the
“popularity of Linux”—in effect, valuing popularity above
freedom. Sometimes this is openly admitted. For instance,
  <a name="index-Wired-magazine">
  </a>
  <cite>
   Wired
  </cite>
  magazine said that
  <a name="index-McMillan_002c-Robert">
  </a>
  Robert McMillan, editor of
  <a name="index-Linux-Magazine">
  </a>
  <cite>
   Linux Magazine
  </cite>
  , “feels
that the move toward open source software should be fueled by
technical, rather than political, decisions.”
  <a href="#FOOT28" name="DOCF28">
   (28)
  </a>
  And
  <a name="index-Caldera">
  </a>
  Caldera’s
CEO openly urged
users to drop the goal of freedom and work instead for the
“popularity of Linux.”
 </p>
 <a name="index-citizen-values_002c-production-v_002e-freedom-and-way-of-life">
 </a>
 <p>
  Adding nonfree software to the GNU/Linux system may increase the
popularity, if by popularity we mean the number of people using some
of GNU/Linux in combination with
nonfree software. But at the same time, it implicitly encourages the
community to accept nonfree software as a good thing, and forget the
goal of freedom. It is not good to drive faster if you can’t stay on the
road.
 </p>
 <a name="index-libraries-_0028comp_002e_0029_002c-as-traps">
 </a>
 <a name="index-traps_002c-nonfree-libraries-1">
 </a>
 <a name="index-traps_002c-nonfree-programming-tools">
 </a>
 <a name="index-developers_002c-traps-for-1">
 </a>
 <a name="index-Motif-_0028see-also-LessTif_0029-2">
 </a>
 <a name="index-LessTif-_0028see-also-Motif_0029-2">
 </a>
 <p>
  When the nonfree “add-on” is a library or programming
tool, it can become a trap for free software developers. When they
write free software that depends on the nonfree package, their
software cannot be part of a completely free system. Motif and
  <a name="index-Qt-2">
  </a>
  Qt trapped large amounts of free software in this way in the past,
creating problems whose solutions took years. Motif remained somewhat
of a problem until it became obsolete and was no longer used. Later,
  <a name="index-Sun-Microsystems">
  </a>
  Sun’s nonfree
  <a name="index-Java">
  </a>
  Java implementation had a similar effect: the Java Trap,
fortunately now mostly corrected.
 </p>
 <p>
  If our community keeps moving in this direction, it could redirect the
future of GNU/Linux into a mosaic of free and nonfree components.
Five years from now, we will surely still have plenty of free
software; but if we are not careful, it will hardly be usable without
the nonfree software that users expect to find with it. If this
happens, our campaign for freedom will have failed.
 </p>
 <p>
  If releasing free alternatives were simply a matter of programming,
solving future problems might become easier as our community’s
development resources increase. But we face obstacles that threaten to
make this harder: laws that prohibit free software. As software patents
mount up, and as laws like the
  <a name="index-DMCA-_0028see-also-_0060_0060Right-to-Read_002c_0027_0027-fair-use_002c-DRM_002c-and-libraries_0029">
  </a>
  Digital Millennium Copyright Act are used to prohibit the development of free software
for important jobs such as viewing a DVD or listening to a
  <a name="index-RealAudio-stream">
  </a>
  RealAudio
stream, we will find ourselves with no clear way to fight the patented
and secret data formats except to
  <em>
   reject the nonfree programs
that use them.
  </em>
 </p>
 <a name="index-call-to-action_002c-fight-for-freedom">
 </a>
 <p>
  Meeting these challenges will require many different kinds of effort.
But what we need above all, to confront any kind of challenge, is to
remember the goal of freedom to cooperate. We can’t expect a mere
desire for powerful, reliable software to motivate people to make
great efforts. We need the kind of determination that people have
when they fight for their freedom and their community—determination
to keep on for years and not give up.
 </p>
 <p>
  In our community, this goal and this determination emanate mainly from
the
  <a name="index-GNU_002c-GNU-Project-6">
  </a>
  GNU Project. We’re the ones who talk about freedom and community
as something to stand firm for; the organizations that speak of
“Linux” normally don’t say this. The magazines about
“Linux” are typically full of ads for nonfree software;
the companies that package “Linux” add nonfree software
to the system; other companies “support Linux” by
developing nonfree applications to run on GNU/Linux; the user groups
for “Linux” typically invite salesmen to present those
applications. The main place people in our community are likely to
come across the idea of freedom and determination is in the GNU
Project.
 </p>
 <p>
  But when people come across it, will they feel it relates to them?
 </p>
 <p>
  People who know they are using a system that came out of the GNU
Project can see a direct relationship between themselves and GNU.
They won’t automatically agree with our philosophy, but at least they
will see a reason to think seriously about it. In contrast, people
who consider themselves “Linux users,” and believe that
the GNU Project “developed tools which proved to be useful in
Linux,” typically perceive only an indirect relationship between
GNU and themselves. They may just ignore the GNU philosophy when they
come across it.
 </p>
 <p>
  The GNU Project is idealistic, and anyone encouraging idealism today
faces a great obstacle: the prevailing ideology encourages people to
dismiss idealism as “impractical.” Our idealism has been
extremely practical: it is the reason we have a
free GNU/Linux operating system.
People who love this system ought to know that it is our idealism made
real.
 </p>
 <a name="index-call-to-action_002c-use-correct-terminology-_0028see-also-terminology_0029-2">
 </a>
 <p>
  If “the job” really were done, if there were nothing at
stake except credit, perhaps it would be wiser to let the matter drop.
But we are not in that position. To inspire people to do the work
that needs to be done, we need to be recognized for what we have
already done. Please help us, by calling the operating
system GNU/Linux.
  <a name="index-nonfree-software_002c-insidious-and-nefarious-addition-of-1">
  </a>
  <a name="index-terminology_002c-importance-of-using-correct-2">
  </a>
  <a name="index-_0060_0060Linux_002c_0027_0027-erroneous-use-of-term-_0028see-also-open-source_0029-2">
  </a>
  <a name="index-GNU_002fLinux-v_002e-_0060_0060Linux_0027_0027-_0028see-also-both-open-source-and-terminology_0029-1">
  </a>
  <a name="index-GNU_002c-GNU_002fLinux-v_002e-_0060_0060Linux_0027_0027-_0028see-also-both-open-source-and-terminology_0029-1">
  </a>
 </p>
 <div class="footnote">
  <hr>
   <h3>
    Footnotes
   </h3>
   <h3>
    <a href="#DOCF28" name="FOOT28">
     (28)
    </a>
   </h3>
   <p>
    Michelle Finley, “French Pols Say, ‘Open It Up,’” 24 April 2000,
    <a href="http://wired.com/politics/law/news/2000/04/35862">
     http://wired.com/politics/law/news/2000/04/35862
    </a>
    .
   </p>
  </hr>
 </div>
 <hr size="2"/>