summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/scrap1_43.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/scrap1_43.html')
-rw-r--r--talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/scrap1_43.html178
1 files changed, 178 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/scrap1_43.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/scrap1_43.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e6c2a3e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/scrap1_43.html
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+<!-- This is the second edition of Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman.
+
+Free Software Foundation
+
+51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor
+
+Boston, MA 02110-1335
+Copyright C 2002, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire book are permitted
+worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this notice is
+preserved. Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations
+of this book from the original English into another language provided
+the translation has been approved by the Free Software Foundation and
+the copyright notice and this permission notice are preserved on all
+copies.
+
+ISBN 978-0-9831592-0-9
+Cover design by Rob Myers.
+
+Cover photograph by Peter Hinely.
+ -->
+
+
+ <a name="Freedom-or-Power_003f">
+ </a>
+ <h1 class="chapter">
+ 43. Freedom or Power?
+ </h1>
+ <p>
+ Written by
+ <a name="index-Kuhn_002c-Bradley-M_002e">
+ </a>
+ Bradley M. Kuhn and Richard Stallman.
+ <br>
+ <em>
+ The love of liberty is the love of others; the love of power is the love of ourselves.
+ </em>
+ </br>
+ </p>
+ <a name="index-Hazlitt_002c-William">
+ </a>
+ <p align="right">
+ —William Hazlitt
+ </p>
+ <br>
+ <a name="index-proprietary-software_002c-freedom-or-power_003f">
+ </a>
+ <p>
+ In the free software movement, we stand for freedom for the users of
+software. We formulated our views by looking at what freedoms are
+necessary for a good way of life, and permit useful programs to foster
+a community of goodwill, cooperation, and collaboration. Our criteria
+for free software specify the freedoms that a program’s users need so
+that they can cooperate in a community.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ We stand for freedom for programmers as well as for other users.
+Most of us are programmers, and we want freedom for ourselves as well
+as for you. But each of us uses software written by others, and we
+want freedom when using that software, not just when using our own
+code. We stand for freedom for all users, whether they program often,
+occasionally, or not at all.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ However, one so-called freedom that we do not advocate is the
+“freedom to choose any license you want for software you
+write.” We reject this because it is really a form of power,
+not a freedom.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ This oft overlooked distinction is crucial. Freedom is being able to make
+decisions that affect mainly you; power is being able to make decisions
+that affect others more than you. If we confuse power with freedom, we
+will fail to uphold real freedom.
+ </p>
+ <a name="index-developers_002c-copyright-law-favors">
+ </a>
+ <p>
+ Making a program proprietary is an exercise of power. Copyright law
+today grants software developers that power, so they and only they
+choose the rules to impose on everyone else—a relatively small
+number of people make the basic software decisions for all users,
+typically by denying their freedom. When users lack the
+freedoms that define free software, they can’t tell what the
+software is doing, can’t check for back doors, can’t monitor possible
+viruses and worms, can’t find out what personal information is being
+reported (or stop the reports, even if they do find out). If it breaks,
+they can’t fix it; they have to wait for the developer to exercise its
+power to do so. If it simply isn’t quite what they need, they are stuck
+with it. They can’t help each other improve it.
+ </p>
+ <a name="index-Microsoft_002c-freedom-or-power_003f">
+ </a>
+ <p>
+ Proprietary software developers are often businesses. We in the free
+software movement are not opposed to business, but we have seen what
+happens when a software business has the “freedom” to
+impose arbitrary rules on the users of software. Microsoft is an
+egregious example of how denying users’ freedoms can lead to direct
+harm, but it is not the only example. Even when there is no monopoly,
+proprietary software harms society. A choice of masters is not
+freedom.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ Discussions of rights and rules for software have often concentrated
+on the interests of programmers alone. Few people in the world
+program regularly, and fewer still are
+ <a name="index-ownership_002c-developers_0027-interests-v_002e-public_0027s-prosperity-and-freedom-1">
+ </a>
+ owners of proprietary software
+businesses. But the entire developed world now needs and uses
+software, so software developers now control the way it lives,
+does business, communicates, and is entertained. The ethical and
+political issues are not addressed by the slogan of “freedom of
+choice (for developers only).”
+ <a name="index-developers_002c-copyright-law-favors-1">
+ </a>
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ If “code is law,”
+ <a href="#FOOT53" name="DOCF53">
+ (53)
+ </a>
+ then the real question we face is: who should control the code you
+use—you, or an elite few? We believe you are entitled to control the
+software you use, and giving you that control is the goal of free
+software.
+ </p>
+ <a name="index-GPL-7">
+ </a>
+ <p>
+ We believe you should decide what to do with the software you use;
+however, that is not what today’s law says. Current copyright law
+places us in the position of power over users of our code, whether we
+like it or not. The ethical response to this situation is to proclaim
+freedom for each user, just as the Bill of Rights was supposed to
+exercise government power by guaranteeing each citizen’s
+freedoms. That is what the GNU General Public License is for: it puts
+you in control of your usage of the software while protecting you from
+others who would like to take control of your decisions.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ As more and more users realize that code is law, and come to feel that
+they too deserve freedom, they will see the importance of the freedoms
+we stand for, just as more and more users have come to appreciate the
+practical value of the free software we have developed.
+ <a name="index-proprietary-software_002c-freedom-or-power_003f-1">
+ </a>
+ </p>
+ <div class="footnote">
+ <hr>
+ <h3>
+ Footnotes
+ </h3>
+ <h3>
+ <a href="#DOCF53" name="FOOT53">
+ (53)
+ </a>
+ </h3>
+ <p>
+ William J. Mitchell,
+ <em>
+ City of Bits: Space, Place, and the
+Infobahn
+ </em>
+ (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1995), p. 111, as quoted by
+Lawrence Lessig in
+ <em>
+ Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version
+2.0
+ </em>
+ (New York, NY: Basic Books, 2006), p. 5.
+ </p>
+ </hr>
+ </div>
+ <hr size="2"/>
+ </br>
+