diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/microsoft-old.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/microsoft-old.html | 122 |
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/microsoft-old.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/microsoft-old.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ff9efcb --- /dev/null +++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/microsoft-old.html @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --> +<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --> +<title>Is Microsoft the Great Satan? (Old Version) +- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title> +<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/microsoft-old.translist" --> +<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --> +<h2>Is Microsoft the Great Satan? (Old Version)</h2> + +<div class="announcement"> +<blockquote><p>There is an <a href="/philosophy/microsoft.html"> +updated version</a> of this article.</p></blockquote> +</div> + +<p>Many people think of Microsoft as the monster menace of the software +industry. There is even a campaign to boycott Microsoft. This feeling +has intensified since Microsoft expressed active hostility towards +free software.</p> + +<p>In the free software movement, our perspective is different. We see +that Microsoft is doing something that is bad for software users: +making software <a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware"> +proprietary</a> and thus denying users their rightful freedom.</p> + +<p>But Microsoft is not alone in this; almost all software companies +do the same thing to the users. If other companies manage to dominate +fewer users than Microsoft, that is not for lack of trying.</p> + +<p>This is not meant to excuse Microsoft. Rather, it is meant as a +reminder that Microsoft is the natural development of a software +industry based on <a href="/philosophy/shouldbefree.html">dividing +users and taking away their freedom</a>. When criticizing Microsoft, +we must not exonerate the other companies that also make proprietary +software. At the FSF, we don't run any proprietary software—not +from Microsoft or anyone else.</p> + +<p>In the “Halloween documents”, released at the end of +October 1998, Microsoft executives stated an intention to use various +methods to obstruct the development of free software: specifically, +designing secret protocols and file formats, and patenting algorithms +and software features.</p> + +<p>These obstructionist policies are nothing new: Microsoft, and many +other software companies, have been doing them for years now. In the +past, probably, their motivation was to attack each other; now, it +seems, we are among the intended targets. But that change in +motivation has no practical consequence, because secret conventions +and software patents obstruct everyone, regardless of the +“intended target”.</p> + +<p>Secrecy and patents do threaten free software. They have obstructed +us greatly in the past, and we must expect they will do so even more +in the future. But this is no different from what was going to happen +even if Microsoft had never noticed us. The only real significance of +the “Halloween documents” is that Microsoft seems to think +that the <a href="/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">GNU/Linux system</a> has +the potential for great success.</p> + +<p>Thank you, Microsoft, and please get out of the way.</p> +</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --> +<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --> +<div id="footer"> +<div class="unprintable"> + +<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to <a +href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org"><gnu@gnu.org></a>. There are also <a +href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> the FSF. Broken links and other +corrections or suggestions can be sent to <a +href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org"><webmasters@gnu.org></a>.</p> + +<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph, + replace it with the translation of these two: + + We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality + translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection. + Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard + to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org"> + <web-translators@gnu.org></a>.</p> + + <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of + our web pages, see <a + href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations + README</a>. --> +Please see the <a +href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations README</a> for +information on coordinating and submitting translations of this article.</p> +</div> + +<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to + files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should + be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this + without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first. + Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the + document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the + document was modified, or published. + + If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too. + Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying + years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable + year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including + being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system). + + There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers + Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --> + +<p>Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2007, 2008, 2009 Free +Software Foundation, Inc.</p> + +<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license" +href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative +Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p> + +<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --> + +<p class="unprintable">Updated: +<!-- timestamp start --> +$Date: 2014/04/12 12:40:16 $ +<!-- timestamp end --> +</p> +</div> +</div> +</body> +</html> |