summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/keep-control-of-your-computing.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/keep-control-of-your-computing.html')
-rw-r--r--talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/keep-control-of-your-computing.html165
1 files changed, 165 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/keep-control-of-your-computing.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/keep-control-of-your-computing.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5345c97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/keep-control-of-your-computing.html
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Keep control of your computing, so it doesn't control you!
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/keep-control-of-your-computing.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Keep control of your computing, so it doesn't control you!</h2>
+
+<p>by Richard Stallman<br />First published in Der Spiegel Online</p>
+
+<p>The World Wide Web, developed by Tim Berners-Lee in 1990 as a system
+for publishing and viewing information, is slowly being transformed
+into a system of remote computing. It will store your data, and data
+about you, often limiting your access to it but allowing FBI access at
+any time. It will do your computing for you, but you cannot control
+what it does. It provides various tempting attractions, but you must
+resist them.</p>
+
+<p>In the 1980s, most people did not use computers; those who did, mostly
+used personal computers or timesharing services. Both allowed you to
+install software of your choice. Both allowed you full control over
+your data, though it is not clear what access the timesharing services
+gave to the FBI. In any case, the timesharing services mostly
+faded away by the 90s.</p>
+
+<p>This does not mean that these users had control of their computing.
+With software, either the users control the program (free software) or
+the program controls the users (proprietary or nonfree software).
+Those users were running proprietary software because that's all there
+was at the time. The users could not change it, or even tell what it
+really did.</p>
+
+<p>The abusiveness of proprietary software has intensified since then;
+nowadays, it is likely to spy on you, intentionally restrict you,
+and/or have back doors. (Windows is known to do all three; likewise
+the iPhone and the Kindle.) But even absent such abuse, it wasn't
+right for users to be controlled by their software.</p>
+
+<p>That's why I launched the free software movement in 1983. We decided
+to develop an operating system and applications that would be entirely
+free (libre, freie), so that the users would have control over them.
+I gave this system the name GNU. (You have probably heard people call
+it &ldquo;Linux&rdquo;, but that's an error.) People who switch to this system,
+and insist on using only free software, are in a position to control
+their computing. We have liberated only a small part of cyberspace,
+as yet, but that is a foothold for freedom.</p>
+
+<p>Developments in the Web threaten to negate this achievement. The
+first problem was the use of invisible references to sites whose
+mission was surveillance (perhaps for advertising). Users who visited
+sites A, B, X and Z did not realize that those pages contained
+invisible references to iamwatchingyou.com, so each visit informed
+that site too, and it recorded permanently that this user had visited
+certain pages.</p>
+
+<p>JavaScript created a further problem. Initially used for harmless
+things such as unusual-looking menus, its capabilities have been
+extended to the point where it can do nontrivial computing. Services
+such as Google Docs install large JavaScript programs into the user's
+browser. Even though they run in your computer, you have no control
+over what they do there.</p>
+
+<p>Then there is the issue of storing your data in companies' servers.
+The largest such companies have little respect for users' privacy.
+For instance, if you hand your data to Facebook, companies pay
+Facebook (not you) for the use of it. They pay Facebook (not you) to
+run ads using your face.</p>
+
+<p>The timesharing companies of the 1980s had usually treated their
+users' data with respect, even though they could occasionally abuse
+them, because their users were paying clients and could go elsewhere.
+Facebook's users do not pay, so they are not its clients. They are
+its merchandise, to be sold to other businesses. If the company is in
+the US, or is a subsidiary of a US company, the FBI can collect this
+data at whim without even a court order under an un-American US law,
+named in purest blackwhiting the &ldquo;Patriot Act&rdquo;.</p>
+
+<p>Services also offer to operate on the users data. In effect, this
+means that users do their computing on the servers, and the servers
+take complete control of that computing.</p>
+
+<p>There is a systematic marketing campaign to drive users to entrusting
+their computing and their data to companies they have absolutely no
+reason to trust. Its buzzword is &ldquo;cloud computing&rdquo;, a term used for
+so many different computing structures that its only real meaning is,
+&ldquo;Do it without thinking about what you're doing&rdquo;.</p>
+
+<p>There is even a product, Google ChromeOS, designed so that it can only
+store data remotely, and the user must do her computing remotely.
+Ironically, it is free software, a version of GNU/Linux. Users will
+have access to the source code, and could change it so as to support
+local computing and local data storage&mdash;if the machine has enough
+memory to store it, and if it permits users to install their own
+versions of the software. If Android phones are any guide, most
+ChromeOS devices will be designed to prevent users from doing that.</p>
+
+<p>This does not mean Internet users can't have privacy. This does not
+mean that Internet users can't have control of their computing. It
+does mean that you'll have to swim against the current to have them.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
+ &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2011 Richard Stallman</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2014/04/12 12:40:11 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>