summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/install-fest-devil.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/install-fest-devil.html')
-rw-r--r--talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/install-fest-devil.html41
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/install-fest-devil.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/install-fest-devil.html
index 730ea38..366c2a6 100644
--- a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/install-fest-devil.html
+++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/install-fest-devil.html
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.87 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.94 -->
<title>Install Fests - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/install-fest-devil.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
@@ -11,11 +11,11 @@
LibrePlanet March 23/24 2019</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Install fests invite users to bring their computers so that experts
-can install GNU/Linux on them. This is meant to promote the idea of
-free software as well as the use of free software. In practice, these
-two goals conflict: users that want to reject nonfree software
-entirely need to choose their computers carefully to achieve that
-goal.</p>
+can install GNU/Linux on them. This is meant to promote the
+<em>idea</em> of free software as well as the <em>use</em> of free
+software. In today's circumstances, where nonfree software dominates,
+these two goals conflict: users that want to reject nonfree software
+entirely need to choose their computers carefully to achieve that goal.</p>
<p>The problem is that most computers can't run with a completely free
GNU/Linux distro. They contain peripherals, or coprocessors, that
@@ -40,11 +40,12 @@ free software movement's message about freedom and justice</a>.</p>
<p>The nonfree software means the user sacrifices freedom for
functionality. If users had to wrestle with this choice, they could
draw a moral lesson from it, and maybe get a better computer later.
-But when the install fest makes the compromise on the user's behalf,
-it shelters the user from the moral dimension; the user never sees
-that something other than convenience is at stake. In effect, the
-install fest makes the deal with the devil, on the user's behalf,
-behind a curtain so the user doesn't recognize that it is one.</p>
+But when the install fest makes the <a href="/philosophy/compromise.html">
+compromise</a> on the user's behalf, it shelters the user from the
+moral dimension; the user never sees that something other than
+convenience is at stake. In effect, the install fest makes the deal
+with the devil, on the user's behalf, behind a curtain so the user
+doesn't recognize that it is one.</p>
<p>I propose that the install fest show users exactly what deal they are
making. Let them talk with the devil individually, learn the deal's
@@ -56,10 +57,11 @@ moral example of rejecting nonfree software.</p>
<p>My new idea is that the install fest could allow the devil to hang
around, off in a corner of the hall, or the next room. (Actually, a
-human being wearing sign saying &ldquo;The Devil,&rdquo; and maybe a toy mask or
-horns.) The devil would offer to install nonfree drivers in the
-user's machine to make more parts of the computer function, explaining
-to the user that the cost of this is using a nonfree (unjust) program.</p>
+human being wearing sign saying &ldquo;The Devil,&rdquo; and maybe a
+toy mask or horns.) The devil would offer to install nonfree drivers
+in the user's machine to make more parts of the computer function,
+explaining to the user that the cost of this is using a nonfree
+(unjust) program.</p>
<p>The install fest would tolerate the devil's presence but not
officially sponsor the devil, or publicize the devil's availability.
@@ -117,8 +119,9 @@ devil, I think that an explicit devil would be less bad. It would
convert the install-fest dilemma from a debilitating contradiction
into a teaching experience. Users would be able to get, if they
insist, the nonfree drivers to make their peripherals run, then use
-GNU/Linux knowing that there is a further step toward freedom that
-they should take.</p>
+GNU/Linux knowing that there is <a
+href="/philosophy/saying-no-even-once.html">a further step toward
+freedom</a> that they should take.</p>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -167,7 +170,7 @@ of this article.</p>
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2019, 2020 Richard Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
@@ -177,7 +180,7 @@ Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/03/21 17:00:59 $
+$Date: 2020/10/24 06:33:52 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>