diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/eldred-amicus.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/eldred-amicus.html | 38 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/eldred-amicus.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/eldred-amicus.html index 952357a..107f3eb 100644 --- a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/eldred-amicus.html +++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/eldred-amicus.html @@ -83,39 +83,39 @@ copyrights by <i>seriatim</i> adoption of nominally <!--Table of Contents--> <ul> -<li><a name="tex2html16" +<li><a id="tex2html16" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION01000000000000000000">Question Presented</a></li> -<li><a name="tex2html17" +<li><a id="tex2html17" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION02000000000000000000">Contents</a></li> -<li><a name="tex2html18" +<li><a id="tex2html18" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION03000000000000000000">Table of Authorities</a></li> -<li><a name="tex2html19" +<li><a id="tex2html19" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION04000000000000000000">Interest of <i>Amicus Curiae</i></a></li> -<li><a name="tex2html20" +<li><a id="tex2html20" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION05000000000000000000">Summary of Argument</a></li> -<li><a name="tex2html21" +<li><a id="tex2html21" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06000000000000000000">Argument</a> <ul> -<li><a name="tex2html22" +<li><a id="tex2html22" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06010000000000000000">The Framers Intended Copyright to Be a Statutory Monopoly Awarded to Works of Authorship For A Strictly Limited Time</a></li> -<li><a name="tex2html23" +<li><a id="tex2html23" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06020000000000000000">The Historical Policy Embodied in the Copyright Clause is Absolutely Essential to Reconcile the Copyright Monopoly with the System of Free Expression</a> <ul> -<li><a name="tex2html24" +<li><a id="tex2html24" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06021000000000000000">Indefinite Extension of the Term of Monopoly on Existing Works of Authorship is Incompatible with Both the Copyright Clause and the First Amendment</a></li> -<li><a name="tex2html25" +<li><a id="tex2html25" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06022000000000000000">The Fifth Amendment Prohibits Legislative Action Such as This With Respect to Physical Property Rights, and There Is No Constitutional @@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ copyrights by <i>seriatim</i> adoption of nominally to be Done with Free Expression</a></li> </ul> </li> -<li><a name="tex2html26" +<li><a id="tex2html26" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION06030000000000000000">Particular Dangers of Abuse and Corruption Justify Strict Constitutional Scrutiny When the Term of Statutory Monopolies is Extended</a></li> </ul> </li> -<li><a name="tex2html27" +<li><a id="tex2html27" href="eldred-amicus.html#SECTION07000000000000000000">Conclusion</a></li> </ul> <!--End of Table of Contents--> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ Curiae</i></h3> <p> This brief is filed on behalf of the Free Software Foundation, a charitable corporation with its main offices in Boston, -Massachusetts.<a name="tex2html1" +Massachusetts.<a id="tex2html1" href="#foot151"><strong>[1]</strong></a> The Foundation believes that people should be free to study, share and improve all the software they use, as they are free to share and improve all the recipes they @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ The Framers of the Constitution unanimously accepted the idea of the limited term for copyrights in the drafting of Article I, without substantial discussion. <i>See</i> 2 Max Farrand, <i>The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787</i>, at 321-325, 505-510, 570, 595 -(1937).<a name="tex2html2" href="#foot152"><strong>[2]</strong></a> In +(1937).<a id="tex2html2" href="#foot152"><strong>[2]</strong></a> In doing so, as the subsequent employment in the Copyright Act of 1790 of the term of years from the Statute of Monopolies shows, the Framers and the First Congress acted in full awareness of the long history of @@ -693,7 +693,7 @@ increase the benefit to the monopolists, whose works have already been created in reliance on the previous allocation of rights, neither promotes the progress of knowledge nor respects the critically-important free speech interest in the health of the public -domain.<a name="tex2html3" +domain.<a id="tex2html3" href="#foot138"><strong>[3]</strong></a></p> <p> @@ -799,20 +799,20 @@ Counsel for <i>Amicus Curiae</i> <hr /> <ul> -<li><a name="foot151" href="#tex2html1"><sup>1</sup></a> Counsel for +<li><a id="foot151" href="#tex2html1"><sup>1</sup></a> Counsel for both parties have consented to the filing of this brief, and those consents have been filed with the Clerk of this Court. No counsel for either party had any role in authoring this brief, and no person other than the <i>amicus</i> and its counsel made any monetary contribution to its preparation and submission.</li> -<li><a name="foot152" href="#tex2html2"><sup>2</sup></a> The only +<li><a id="foot152" href="#tex2html2"><sup>2</sup></a> The only amendment made was in the replacement of the phrase originally suggested by Charles Pinckney of South Carolina, that monopolies be granted for a “certain” time. <i>See</i> 3 <i>id.</i>, at 122.</li> -<li><a name="foot138" href="#tex2html3"><sup>3</sup></a> The Court of +<li><a id="foot138" href="#tex2html3"><sup>3</sup></a> The Court of Appeals minimized the importance of the impoverishment of the public domain when it maintained that “[p]reserving access to works that would otherwise disappear—not enter the public domain but @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ notice, and the copyright notice, are preserved.</p> <p class="unprintable">Updated: <!-- timestamp start --> -$Date: 2015/05/29 07:59:56 $ +$Date: 2020/12/08 22:02:36 $ <!-- timestamp end --> </p> </div> |