summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/correcting-france-mistake.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/correcting-france-mistake.html')
-rw-r--r--talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/correcting-france-mistake.html116
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/correcting-france-mistake.html b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/correcting-france-mistake.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..55f65be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/talermerchantdemos/blog/articles/en/correcting-france-mistake.html
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Correcting My Mistake about French Law - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/correcting-france-mistake.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Correcting My Mistake about French Law</h2>
+
+<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard
+Stallman</strong></a></p>
+
+<p>For several years I've said in my speeches that it was a crime in
+France, punishable by imprisonment, to have a copy of the free
+software that can decrypt the video on a DVD. That encryption is an
+example of DRM (Digital Restrictions Management), the malicious
+features <a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org/">designed to restrict
+users</a>.</p>
+
+<p>That is what Sarkozy's DADVSI law said when it was adopted, but I
+recently learned that the Conseil d'Etat introduced some
+exceptions. In fact, free software to decrypt and play DVDs is
+legally distributed in France&mdash;unlike the US, where it was censored
+by the infamous 1998 law, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.</p>
+
+<p>However, it's not clear whether this will apply to other DRM schemes.
+There is a danger that the complex conditions will specifically
+prohibit free software for playing Bluray disks and allow only
+proprietary software. Thus, it is not a crime in France to possess
+the free software that can play a DVD, but it is yet to be decided
+whether it is a crime to possess a free program to play a Bluray disk.</p>
+
+<p>It is certainly not <em>wrong</em> to have a copy of such a program.
+The software that's wrong is nonfree software; the only ethical
+program to play a video, or do anything else, is a free program. The
+wrong here is in the law itself. However, as long as it exists, if
+you are a dissident in France you should keep such programs hidden.</p>
+
+<p>When I first got a drive that handles DVDs, the reason I decided not
+to install free DVD-playing software was because of this French law.
+I go to France from time to time, and I was concerned there might be
+some who would wish to have me imprisoned for this so as to terrorize
+other netizens. I refuse to have any nonfree software, and the only
+option that left me was to have no software for this job. Thus, I
+could not play encrypted DVDs at all.</p>
+
+<p>Knowing now that I won't be imprisoned for bringing libdvdcss into
+France, I could consider having a copy, which would give me the option
+of playing DVDs that have DRM.</p>
+
+<p>However, I think I won't do it. I have got used to avoiding encrypted
+DVDs, and this has the bonus of giving Hollywood no money with which to
+lobby for nasty laws like SOPA. Why change?</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:gnu@gnu.org">&lt;gnu@gnu.org&gt;</a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:webmasters@gnu.org">&lt;webmasters@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org">
+ &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2012, 2014 Richard M. Stallman.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2014/04/12 12:39:59 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>