diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | taler-fc19/paper.tex | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/taler-fc19/paper.tex b/taler-fc19/paper.tex index 30024a6..4ca94e0 100644 --- a/taler-fc19/paper.tex +++ b/taler-fc19/paper.tex @@ -1265,8 +1265,8 @@ Our instantiation satisfies {weak income transparency}. in this graph, where each refresh $R_i \in F$ either results in a coin in
exclusive control of the adversary after step \ref{game:income:spend}, or the
refresh operation does not result in a coin at all.
- %TODO: The preceeding paragraph is basically nonsense. We need to resurect
- % correct construction of F from games.tex
+ %TODO: The preceeding paragraph is still basically nonsense.
+ % We need to resurect correct construction of F from games.tex
During each $R_i \in F$, the adversary must have submitted a blinded coin
and transfer public key for which the linking protocol fails to produce the
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ Our instantiation satisfies {weak income transparency}. The last case can be excluded, because it would violate the key exchange
completeness assumption.
- % TODO: Wrong
+ % TODO: Still wrong because we need to talk about honest key generation somewhere
We shall prove
\begin{equation}\label{eq:income-transparency-proof}
|